Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.
Historical analysis snapshot.
At a glance: AAPL is roughly 17 hours old with only 73 holders and catastrophic supply concentration: one wallet holds 80.0% (unlabelled wallet) and a second holds 18.2% (unlabelled wallet), leaving under 2% for everyone else. Ranks 3–18 each hold a near-identical ~0.11% slice — a textbook fingerprint of a bundled/scripted launch distribution to sibling wallets. Reported price ($2.1e-15), market cap, FDV and liquidity are all null or nonsensical, and the 'buy volume' of $65B against $433k of sells over ~13 hours is broken bonding-curve accounting, not a real market. Mint and freeze authorities being inactive is the only structural positive; the deployer being the system address (unlabelled wallet) means true dev linkage cannot be verified, so no comfort can be taken from 'no dev selling'. The token is far too young and structurally lopsided to judge as anything but a launch-stage insider vehicle.
Exact Solana mint: 2t9si3RjTXJTVmmcVSNqegspVAGbsHeKxPdNWEzCKHXi. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.
AAPL Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: AAPL received an Overall Health Score of 12 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: AAPL received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.
What changed between saved analyses?
No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.
AAPL Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- unlabelled wallet holds 80.00% and unlabelled wallet holds 18.20%. Either wallet can end price discovery in a single transaction; there is no float to speak of.
- priceUsd is 2.1e-15 and marketCapUsd, fdvUsd and liquidityUsd are all null. Exit feasibility cannot be assessed and reported 'volume' figures are unreliable.
- The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-08-25 13:21 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure.
AAPL Risk and Health Signals
- Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
- Neither authority is active and no dangerous token extensions are flagged, removing the classic mint-inflation and freeze-on-sell attack vectors.
- Observed wallet activity does not establish the wallet holder's motives or conviction.
- Only 6 sells vs 2,979 buys in the covered window, and the 80%/18% whales have not distributed. This reads more as no exit yet than as demand — the two whales have not needed to sell.
AAPL Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 99.09% of supply.
Is AAPL Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: inconclusive.
AAPL Risk Analysis Questions
Which Solana token does this AAPL report analyse?
AAPL (AAPL) is identified by Solana mint 2t9si3RjTXJTVmmcVSNqegspVAGbsHeKxPdNWEzCKHXi; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.
What is the AI health score for AAPL (AAPL)?
The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 12/100 for AAPL, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.
What is the automated rug risk level for AAPL (AAPL)?
The on-chain checks rated rug risk for AAPL as 'Extreme'.
What is the entry assessment for AAPL (AAPL)?
The entry assessment for AAPL is avoid.
How much liquidity does AAPL (AAPL) have?
Liquidity for AAPL was not established in this saved analysis.
Are the mint and freeze authorities active for AAPL (AAPL)?
At the saved check for AAPL, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.
What is the top-10 holder concentration for AAPL (AAPL)?
At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 99.09% of the total supply of AAPL.
Was a sell route found for AAPL (AAPL) in the saved analysis?
Sell-route availability for AAPL was not established in the saved analysis.
When was the AI analysis for AAPL (AAPL) last updated?
The on-chain analysis for AAPL was last updated on 25/08/2026, 13:21:14 GMT.