Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.
Historical analysis snapshot.
At a glance: AAPL is a ~17-hour-old Meteora launch with only 58 holders, no reported market cap or liquidity figure, and a functionally meaningless price of $2.14e-15. Supply is critically concentrated in two unlabeled wallets: unlabelled wallet holds 80.0% and unlabelled wallet holds 18.5%, together controlling 98.5% of supply with no holding history and no exchange tags to explain it. Mint and freeze authorities are both disabled, which removes one class of structural risk, but two anonymous wallets holding essentially all supply is an insider-grade risk that dominates everything else. Recent flow shows heavy launch-window buying (2,939 buys vs 8 sells) with almost no whale distribution yet, but this is noise on a token far too young to have any track record. No key levels are available and no defensible entry framing exists on the data provided.
Exact Solana mint: 4Tt9TM9S272kFpY21J7ZYNAi7wM9vdKvZtTJTFRecerW. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.
AAPL Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: AAPL received an Overall Health Score of 14 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: AAPL received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.
What changed between saved analyses?
No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.
AAPL Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- unlabelled wallet (80.0%) and unlabelled wallet (18.5%) are unlabeled, have no retrievable holding history, and could dump the token to zero at any moment. Either wallet acting alone ends the market.
- liquidityUsd, marketCapUsd and FDV are all null, so exit feasibility cannot be verified. The $2.14e-15 quote implies a pool state where meaningful size cannot round-trip.
- At ~17 hours old with only 58 wallets and a median balance of 323 tokens, there is no holder base or track record to lean on. Any structural read is provisional.
AAPL Risk and Health Signals
- Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
- Neither authority is active, so supply cannot be inflated and balances cannot be frozen. This removes one structural rug vector, though it does not offset wallet-level concentration.
- 2,939 buys vs 8 sells across 766 unique buyers in ~13.5 hours, with net flow strongly positive. This is typical launch euphoria and says nothing about durability.
- All 10 tracked whales show zero net change over 1/7/30 days, but 'never sold' status is null because history is too short. Absence of selling this early is not the same as commitment.
AAPL Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 99.27% of supply.
Is AAPL Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: inconclusive.
AAPL Risk Analysis Questions
Which Solana token does this AAPL report analyse?
AAPL (AAPL) is identified by Solana mint 4Tt9TM9S272kFpY21J7ZYNAi7wM9vdKvZtTJTFRecerW; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.
What is the AI health score for AAPL (AAPL)?
The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 14/100 for AAPL, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.
What is the automated rug risk level for AAPL (AAPL)?
The on-chain checks rated rug risk for AAPL as 'Extreme'.
What is the entry assessment for AAPL (AAPL)?
The entry assessment for AAPL is avoid.
How much liquidity does AAPL (AAPL) have?
Liquidity for AAPL was not established in this saved analysis.
Are the mint and freeze authorities active for AAPL (AAPL)?
At the saved check for AAPL, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.
What is the top-10 holder concentration for AAPL (AAPL)?
At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 99.27% of the total supply of AAPL.
Was a sell route found for AAPL (AAPL) in the saved analysis?
Sell-route availability for AAPL was not established in the saved analysis.
When was the AI analysis for AAPL (AAPL) last updated?
The on-chain analysis for AAPL was last updated on 25/08/2026, 08:17:49 GMT.