MemeAssist

AAPL Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: AAPL saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: AAPL received an Overall Health Score of 10 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: AAPL received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: 7xCKNme27mtpL8CPZtAqW3W8RgQs68GzG4rS59jBG5bn

Stale: analysed 72 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

One wallet controls 80% of the supply

Health Score
10/100
Rug risk
75/100 · Extreme

One wallet controls 80% of the supply. Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing. A valid measured setup is not established.

  • Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing.
  • One wallet controls 80% of the supply
  • A valid measured setup is not established.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: AAPL is roughly 15 hours old with no reported market cap, FDV, or liquidity figures, so any read here is highly provisional and the two-day score trajectory (8→9) reflects a static snapshot, not durability. Holder concentration is extreme and structurally alarming: wallet unlabelled wallet holds 80% of supply and unlabelled wallet holds another 18.6%, so two unlabeled wallets control 98.6% of tokens across just 74 holders. The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-08-24 11:21 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. Wallet activity does not establish the creator's intentions. With one entity holding 80%, null liquidity data, a nonsensical sub-picosecond price, and a Meteora DBC bonding-curve venue, exit feasibility is unverifiable and a single decision by either top wallet would end the token.

Exact Solana mint: 7xCKNme27mtpL8CPZtAqW3W8RgQs68GzG4rS59jBG5bn. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

AAPL Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: AAPL received an Overall Health Score of 10 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: AAPL received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

AAPL Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • unlabelled wallet controls 80,000,153,801 tokens (80% of supply) with no label or lockup evidence. A single transfer or sell from this wallet would collapse the token entirely.
  • Adding unlabelled wallet's 18.6% stake, just two unlabeled non-pool wallets control 98.6% of AAPL across a holder base of only 74 addresses. This is a textbook exit-scam supply structure regardless of intent.
  • Overview reports null for liquidityUsd, marketCapUsd, and fdvUsd, and the quoted price of 2.09e-15 USD on a Meteora DBC bonding-curve pair means exit feasibility cannot be verified. Traders cannot size positions against unknown depth.

AAPL Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Both mintAuthorityActive and freezeAuthorityActive are false, so supply cannot be inflated and balances cannot be frozen. This removes two common rug vectors but does nothing about the concentrated supply already outstanding.
  • The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-08-24 11:21 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. The dev address resolves to the system program (unlabelled wallet), suggesting no direct creator wallet is tracked, and no dev sells are recorded across 1d/7d/30d windows. Note that the two mega-wallets are unlabeled and could still be insiders.
  • 7,088 buys from 1,387 unique wallets vs 13 sells from 9 wallets over ~13 hours shows strong launch interest, but this is typical bonding-curve seeding and does not translate into holder stickiness at ~15 hours old.

AAPL Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 99.28% of supply.

Is AAPL Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: inconclusive.

AAPL Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this AAPL report analyse?

AAPL (AAPL) is identified by Solana mint 7xCKNme27mtpL8CPZtAqW3W8RgQs68GzG4rS59jBG5bn; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for AAPL (AAPL)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 10/100 for AAPL, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for AAPL (AAPL)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for AAPL as 'Extreme'.

What is the entry assessment for AAPL (AAPL)?

The entry assessment for AAPL is avoid.

How much liquidity does AAPL (AAPL) have?

Liquidity for AAPL was not established in this saved analysis.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for AAPL (AAPL)?

At the saved check for AAPL, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for AAPL (AAPL)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 99.28% of the total supply of AAPL.

Was a sell route found for AAPL (AAPL) in the saved analysis?

Sell-route availability for AAPL was not established in the saved analysis.

When was the AI analysis for AAPL (AAPL) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for AAPL was last updated on 24/08/2026, 11:21:10 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings