MemeAssist

AAPL Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: AAPL saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: AAPL received an Overall Health Score of 15 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: AAPL received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: 82N9pkjrSwFDG3u7EiegwyTiy5V5jqBSmFUSshDgz1V6

Stale: analysed 71 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

One wallet controls 80% of the supply

Health Score
15/100
Rug risk
75/100 · Extreme

One wallet controls 80% of the supply. Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing. A valid measured setup is not established.

  • Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing.
  • One wallet controls 80% of the supply
  • A valid measured setup is not established.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: AAPL is under 17 hours old on a Meteora DBC bonding curve with no reported market cap, FDV or liquidity value and only 88 holders. Two unlabeled wallets still control 98.3% of supply (unlabelled wallet 80%, D7pD…9kn 18.3%), and 16 mid-tier wallets sit at near-identical ~0.10% balances — a fingerprint highly consistent with launch-buying group/suspected coordinated distribution at launch rather than organic accumulation. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive and the creator resolves to the system program, so no direct dev-selling is observable, but that does not offset the two-wallet grip. Sell pressure over the last ~12h is small and comes from fresh sub-day wallets while buys dominate roughly 2,953 to 14, yet with price quoted at 2e-15 and no USD liquidity figure this flow is essentially uninterpretable as strength. The token is far too young and too structurally concentrated to judge durability; the two-wallet 98% grip plus the cloned mid-tier wallets remains the dominant risk.

Exact Solana mint: 82N9pkjrSwFDG3u7EiegwyTiy5V5jqBSmFUSshDgz1V6. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

AAPL Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: AAPL received an Overall Health Score of 15 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: AAPL received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

AAPL Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • unlabelled wallet holds 80.00% and D7pD…9kn holds 18.33%, both non-pool wallets. Either can end the token unilaterally at any time.
  • Ranks 3–18 each hold ~0.10% within a very tight band, a fingerprint consistent with launch-buying group/suspected coordinated distribution at launch rather than 16 independent buyers. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only.
  • liquidityUsd, marketCapUsd and FDV are all null, and price is quoted at 2e-15. Exit feasibility and true float value cannot be verified.

AAPL Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Both authorities are disabled, removing supply-inflation and account-freeze as direct rug vectors.
  • The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-08-25 00:52 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. The creator address resolves to the system program (11111…111) with zero recorded sells across 1d/7d/30d, so no direct insider distribution is visible on-chain.
  • Top-10 whale balances show 0 change over 1d, 7d and 30d — no accumulation but also no distribution yet, which is expected given the token's age.

AAPL Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 99.16% of supply.

Is AAPL Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: inconclusive.

AAPL Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this AAPL report analyse?

AAPL (AAPL) is identified by Solana mint 82N9pkjrSwFDG3u7EiegwyTiy5V5jqBSmFUSshDgz1V6; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for AAPL (AAPL)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 15/100 for AAPL, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for AAPL (AAPL)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for AAPL as 'Extreme'.

What is the entry assessment for AAPL (AAPL)?

The entry assessment for AAPL is avoid.

How much liquidity does AAPL (AAPL) have?

Liquidity for AAPL was not established in this saved analysis.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for AAPL (AAPL)?

At the saved check for AAPL, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for AAPL (AAPL)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 99.16% of the total supply of AAPL.

Was a sell route found for AAPL (AAPL) in the saved analysis?

Sell-route availability for AAPL was not established in the saved analysis.

When was the AI analysis for AAPL (AAPL) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for AAPL was last updated on 25/08/2026, 00:52:40 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings