MemeAssist

AAPL Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: AAPL saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: AAPL received an Overall Health Score of 11 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: AAPL received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: AcwhxnKUQn9eSirSgu87YB4MR5HY9JZz1hakF9qiT7fk

Stale: analysed 72 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

One wallet controls 80% of the supply

Health Score
11/100
Rug risk
75/100 · Extreme

One wallet controls 80% of the supply. Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing. A valid measured setup is not established.

  • Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing.
  • One wallet controls 80% of the supply
  • A valid measured setup is not established.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: AAPL is a ~19-hour-old Meteora DBC launch with just 68 holders and a supply structure that is effectively controlled by two unlabelled wallets — unlabelled wallet holds 80.00% and unlabelled wallet holds 18.29%, together 98.3% of supply, with the top-20 at 99.99%. Mint and freeze authorities are both off, which removes one class of control risk, but does nothing to blunt the concentration: either whale can end the token unilaterally. Liquidity, market cap and FDV are all reported null and the quoted price of $2.07e-15 with only one buy in the last 24h means there is no reliable price discovery or exit depth. Recent swap history in a partial 14h window shows aggressive small-wallet round-tripping (unlabelled wallet and unlabelled wallet exiting entirely) rather than organic accumulation, and the sub-$0.01% shrimp cohort collectively holds less than 0.02% of supply. This is far too young to judge durability and the structure is dominated by two wallets, so any read here is a launch snapshot, not a track record.

Exact Solana mint: AcwhxnKUQn9eSirSgu87YB4MR5HY9JZz1hakF9qiT7fk. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

AAPL Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: AAPL received an Overall Health Score of 11 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: AAPL received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

AAPL Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • unlabelled wallet (80.00%) and unlabelled wallet (18.29%) together hold nearly the entire supply outside pools. Either wallet selling would fully wipe holders below them.
  • liquidityUsd, marketCapUsd and FDV are all null with $0 reported 24h volume on the aggregator. There is no verifiable depth to exit into at any size.
  • Only 68 total holders, with the shrimp cohort (<0.01%) collectively holding 0.019% of supply. There is no organic distribution to absorb even a small whale sale.

AAPL Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Both mintAuthorityActive and freezeAuthorityActive are false, removing the ability to print new supply or freeze wallets. This narrows the structural attack surface even though concentration remains dominant.
  • The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-08-24 21:56 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. Dev activity shows sold1d/7d/30d all zero and slowRugRisk is flagged low. No creator-side distribution is visible in the covered window.
  • In the partial 14h window there are 2,931 buys from 750 unique wallets vs 14 sells from 12 wallets. Flow is one-sided but the sell side is so thin it likely reflects launch mechanics rather than genuine demand imbalance.

AAPL Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 99.15% of supply.

Is AAPL Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: inconclusive.

AAPL Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this AAPL report analyse?

AAPL (AAPL) is identified by Solana mint AcwhxnKUQn9eSirSgu87YB4MR5HY9JZz1hakF9qiT7fk; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for AAPL (AAPL)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 11/100 for AAPL, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for AAPL (AAPL)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for AAPL as 'Extreme'.

What is the entry assessment for AAPL (AAPL)?

The entry assessment for AAPL is avoid.

How much liquidity does AAPL (AAPL) have?

Liquidity for AAPL was not established in this saved analysis.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for AAPL (AAPL)?

At the saved check for AAPL, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for AAPL (AAPL)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 99.15% of the total supply of AAPL.

Was a sell route found for AAPL (AAPL) in the saved analysis?

Sell-route availability for AAPL was not established in the saved analysis.

When was the AI analysis for AAPL (AAPL) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for AAPL was last updated on 24/08/2026, 21:56:41 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings