Server-rendered summary

ALLOX Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.

Historical analysis snapshot. This report is more than six hours old. This snapshot is not a current buy or sell signal. Trade decisions, prices, levels and sellability may have changed. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

Exact Solana mint: 7GNeMXixnnuqZvxDgdUBm2ZgX5AgkBFfUh5rtyQUeqdR

ALLOX Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: AlloX has an Overall Health Score of 28 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: AlloX has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

ALLOX Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • 51 wallets each hold >1% of supply and collectively control ~86.3% of tokens; virtually all top whale wallets were active for the first time within hours of the token's launch (avg holding 0.13 days), which is a strong indicator of coordinated multi-wallet positioning rather than organic accumulation.
  • Whales account for 48–51% of all sell volume across every measured window (1h, 12h, ~14h), with a net sell imbalance of ~2 billion tokens over 14 hours; multiple top-holder wallets ([redacted wallet], [redacted wallet], 4NoF…V5K, Be4S…Ba2) have all sold meaningful positions while retaining ~1.6% each, consistent with slow distribution rather than exiting.
  • With only $52.8K in DEX liquidity against a $1.35M market cap (~3.9% ratio), any whale attempting to exit even 1% of supply would face extreme slippage; this is a classic exit-feasibility risk for a DEX-native token with concentrated supply.

ALLOX Risk and Health Signals

  • Both mint authority and freeze authority are confirmed inactive with null addresses, removing the risk of supply dilution or wallet freezing — two structural red flags that are absent here.
  • Across all windows, buy transaction counts consistently exceed sell counts (e.g. 39,871 buys vs 31,754 sells over 24h; 1,781 vs 1,430 over 1h), indicating broader retail participation on the buy side even as whale volume skews to selling.
  • Reported 24h volume of ~$50.9M against a $1.35M market cap represents a turnover ratio of ~38x, indicating intense speculative interest; however, this also reflects the token's extreme volatility and does not confirm sustainable demand.

ALLOX Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 19.5% of supply.

Is ALLOX Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
  • Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

ALLOX Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 3 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.000009723255606150959; nearest resistance: 0.000013602223370263744; Levels derived from 31 1h candles (~30 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Price is at/near its window high with no overhead swing resistance; resistance shown is the window high plus measured-move projections. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

ALLOX Price and Market Data

Assessment: AlloX (ALLOX) is ~1.2 days old, trading at $0.00001348 with a $1.35M market cap and only $52.8K in DEX liquidity — a liquidity-to-market-cap ratio of roughly 3.9%, which is extremely thin and makes large exits nearly impossible without severe price impact. Whale-driven sell volume accounts for ~48–51% of total sell-side flow across all measured windows, with net sell pressure of over 2 billion tokens across the observed ~14-hour window, and no whale cohort member has a meaningful track record of holding. Authorities (mint and freeze) are inactive, which removes two structural red flags, and the reported dev wallet shows zero selling activity; however, the dev address resolves to the system program (all-ones address), meaning the true deployer identity is unconfirmed.

Reason: Extreme multi-wallet whale concentration with coordinated near-simultaneous entry, persistent net sell dominance across all windows, and critically thin liquidity create a structurally fragile setup where any meaningful whale rotation could collapse price against retail buyers with no exit depth.

Report limitations

  • This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
  • It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.

Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.

Analyzed: