Anthropic Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Anthropic Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: AnthropicAI has an Overall Health Score of 10 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: AnthropicAI has an extreme Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Trade Check: AnthropicAI saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: unavailable. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.

Anthropic Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• [redacted wallet] holds 80.0% and [redacted wallet] holds 18.8% of total supply — 98.8% between two unidentified, unlabelled wallets with no pool offset. Any decision by either wallet to sell would be catastrophic for price and likely unexitable given zero reported liquidity.
• liquidityUsd is reported as 0 despite $144M market cap and $59M 24-hour volume; this is internally contradictory and suggests either data unavailability or that the market cap figure is unreliable. No liquidity means no verifiable exit route at any scale.
• At ~1 day old the token has no demonstrated holder stability, no price history beyond projected levels, and no basis for trusting any structural signal as durable. All positive observations are snapshots with zero track record.

Anthropic Risk and Health Signals

• [redacted wallet] and [redacted wallet] show 0 change over 1d/7d/30d windows; they are not actively selling into current volume, which prevents an immediate collapse — but at 1 day old this observation carries minimal weight.
• Both mintAuthorityActive and freezeAuthorityActive are false with null authority addresses, removing the risk of supply inflation or wallet freezing as structural attack vectors.
• 2,906 buy trades vs. 17 sell trades over ~20.7 hours, with buy volume of ~$41.8B tokens vs. sell volume of ~$768K tokens; sell pressure is entirely from small wallets with no top-holder or dev involvement.

Anthropic Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 99.4% of supply.

Is Anthropic Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

Anthropic Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 2 resistance areas were identified from 5m market candles; nearest support: 0.000983273464174524; nearest resistance: 0.0021615799755977973; Levels derived from 48 5m candles (~6 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Price is at/near its window high with no overhead swing resistance; resistance shown is the window high plus measured-move projections. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

Anthropic Price and Market Data

Assessment: AnthropicAI (Anthropic) is a 1-day-old PumpSwap token with a $144M reported market cap and ~$59M in 24-hour volume, but zero reported DEX liquidity — making the market cap figure unverifiable and exit feasibility deeply questionable. The holder structure is critically concentrated: wallet [redacted wallet] holds 80% of supply and wallet [redacted wallet] holds a further 18.8%, meaning two unlabelled wallets control 98.8% of total supply with no pool offset, no holding-duration data, and no cluster linkage resolved. Both wallets are currently showing zero change across all observed windows, which is the only mildly reassuring structural signal, but at 1 day old this provides no meaningful track record. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive, and the slow-rug heuristic is flagged low, but the combination of near-total supply concentration in two anonymous wallets, zero confirmed liquidity, and an age of roughly one day makes participation structurally indefensible for most participants.

Reason: Two anonymous wallets controlling 98.8% of supply on a 1-day-old token with zero confirmed liquidity and a parabolic 12,091% price move makes participation structurally indefensible regardless of buy-side flow.

Report limitations

• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.