Server-rendered summary

Anthropic Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.

Historical analysis snapshot. This report is more than six hours old. This snapshot is not a current buy or sell signal. Trade decisions, prices, levels and sellability may have changed. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

Exact Solana mint: HRs4Znvo7wtx95YwVNdQJDwvijiqMvL8MHtYQepqyENN

Anthropic Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: AnthropicAI has an Overall Health Score of 7 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: AnthropicAI has an extreme Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Trade Check: AnthropicAI saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: unavailable. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.

Anthropic Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • Two unlabelled wallets (ExW7…Rj3 at 80% and GYh4…WNw at ~19%) control ~98.9% of total supply with no verified identity or holding history. Any move by either wallet to sell would collapse price against a pool with only $18.82 in liquidity.
  • $18.82 in DEX liquidity against a $313K stated market cap (ratio ~0.006%) means that any sell beyond a trivial token amount would move price catastrophically; the reported market cap is almost entirely fictional at this depth.
  • At ~0.95 days old, there is no meaningful price history, no holder durability data, and no demonstrated ability to survive beyond the initial launch window; structural risks carry maximum weight at this age.

Anthropic Risk and Health Signals

  • Neither mint nor freeze authority is active, meaning the supply cannot be inflated and wallets cannot be frozen; this removes two of the most dangerous rug-enablers but does not offset the concentration risk.
  • The token controls check returned no active dangerous extensions and no dormant extension warnings, which is the minimum expected hygiene for a new token.
  • ExW7…Rj3 and GYh4…WNw show zero change over 1d/7d/30d windows, but given the token is under one day old and the data covers essentially the full token lifespan, 'holding so far' carries almost no predictive value.

Anthropic Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 99.5% of supply.

Is Anthropic Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
  • Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

Anthropic Price and Market Data

Assessment: AnthropicAI (Anthropic) is less than one day old with a reported market cap of ~$313K but only $18.82 in DEX liquidity — effectively a ghost pool that cannot support any meaningful exit. Supply concentration remains catastrophic: wallet ExW7…Rj3 holds 80% and GYh4…WNw holds ~19%, meaning two unlabelled wallets control ~98.9% of all supply with no holding history, no verified identity, and no observed selling — yet. The most damaging observable event is that wallet Azo5…eyb, not currently a top holder, dumped ~5.76 billion tokens in the 24-hour window, accounting for ~99.95% of all sell volume by token count and fully exiting its position, a pattern consistent with an early insider or bundled-buy participant flipping at launch.

Reason: Two unidentified wallets controlling ~99% of supply sit above $18.82 of real liquidity — any sell from either wallet at any size would be unabsorbable, making participation indefensible regardless of other signals.

Report limitations

  • This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
  • It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.

Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.

Analyzed: