Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.
Historical analysis snapshot.
At a glance: Apple (AAPL) is an extremely fresh token — less than 9 hours old — with zero reported market cap, zero 24-hour volume, and null liquidity depth, making it impossible to assess exit feasibility or price durability. Supply concentration is catastrophic: two unlabelled wallets (unlabelled wallet at 80.0% and 474m…jXJ at 19.4%) together hold over 99.35% of all tokens, leaving the entire remaining holder base fighting over less than 0.65% of supply. Both mint and freeze authorities are inactive, which removes one structural red flag, but the extreme concentration in two unidentified wallets — combined with null liquidity — creates a near-perfect exit-scam or rug configuration regardless. At fewer than 10 hours old with 51 holders, no observable volume in the last hour, and critical data missing across market cap, liquidity, and price change, this token has no track record whatsoever and the observable structure is deeply unfavourable.
Exact Solana mint: 9tLmPB1xGRq6bu7SEvc61RfrKCergfLRRXHvh7CZn67m. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.
AAPL Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: Apple received an Overall Health Score of 8 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: Apple received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.
What changed between saved analyses?
No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.
AAPL Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- Wallet unlabelled wallet holds 80.0% and wallet 474m…jXJ holds 19.4% of total supply — together 99.35% — with no pool label and no identification. Either wallet dumping at any time would be catastrophic and there is no liquidity buffer to absorb it.
- Liquidity depth, market cap, and FDV are all null, meaning the cost to move price to zero is unquantifiable but almost certainly negligible given the token's age and trading history. Holders have no verifiable ability to exit at any meaningful value.
- At 0.38 days old, there is zero evidence of durability, stable holder growth, or sustained buy-side demand. All positive signals from the early trading window must be treated as meaningless noise at this age.
AAPL Risk and Health Signals
- Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
- Both mintAuthorityActive and freezeAuthorityActive are false with null authority addresses, removing the risk of new supply issuance or wallet-level asset freezes — a meaningful baseline structural positive.
- The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-08-18 00:51 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. However, the dev address resolves to the system program (unlabelled wallet), suggesting the true deployer identity may not be captured.
- Within the ~4.3-hour observable window, 2,987 buy trades against only 5 sell trades were recorded, with buy volume (~45 billion tokens) dwarfing sell volume (~140k tokens). At this age with null liquidity context, this likely reflects launch mechanics rather than genuine organic demand.
AAPL Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 99.68% of supply.
Is AAPL Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: inconclusive.
AAPL Risk Analysis Questions
Which Solana token does this AAPL report analyse?
Apple (AAPL) is identified by Solana mint 9tLmPB1xGRq6bu7SEvc61RfrKCergfLRRXHvh7CZn67m; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.
What is the AI health score for Apple (AAPL)?
The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 8/100 for AAPL, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.
What is the automated rug risk level for Apple (AAPL)?
The on-chain checks rated rug risk for AAPL as 'Extreme'.
What is the entry assessment for Apple (AAPL)?
The entry assessment for AAPL is avoid.
How much liquidity does Apple (AAPL) have?
Liquidity for AAPL was not established in this saved analysis.
Are the mint and freeze authorities active for Apple (AAPL)?
At the saved check for AAPL, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.
What is the top-10 holder concentration for Apple (AAPL)?
At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 99.68% of the total supply of AAPL.
Was a sell route found for Apple (AAPL) in the saved analysis?
Sell-route availability for AAPL was not established in the saved analysis.
When was the AI analysis for Apple (AAPL) last updated?
The on-chain analysis for AAPL was last updated on 18/08/2026, 00:51:13 GMT.