Server-rendered summary
ARCHIBROWN Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup
Exact Solana mint: HaYRgD7rjwj1AwoWjafokj4196sufYm4vKFamLZVpump
ARCHIBROWN Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: Archibald Brown has an Overall Health Score of 38 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: Archibald Brown has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.
ARCHIBROWN Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- Two on-chain clusters are identified by direct token transfers: [redacted wallet] ↔ jd79…aFM (~5.8% combined) and [redacted wallet] ↔ Gykp…B9K (~4.8% combined). Within these clusters, jd79…aFM shed 30.15M tokens in 24h and [redacted wallet] shed ~19.9M, meaning linked wallets are actively distributing while paired wallets accumulate — a potential internal rotation or coordinated exit pattern.
- No creator wallet could be identified from on-chain data, meaning insider supply, dev allocation, and rug history are entirely unverifiable. This is a structural blind spot: any wallet could be a disguised dev without triggering a flag.
- Price is down ~38.6% over 24 hours following an early pump; net sell volume over ~10.6 hours is negative and whale/big wallets account for ~86% of sell volume by token amount. This pattern is consistent with early buyers and snipers rotating out after a spike.
ARCHIBROWN Risk and Health Signals
- Both mint and freeze authorities are null and inactive, meaning no party can dilute supply or freeze holder balances — a clean baseline for a fresh PumpSwap launch.
- Net whale flow is positive at +35.4M tokens over 24h and +76.9M over 7 days, with 8 of 10 tracked whale wallets showing net buying. This buying pressure is partially counterbalanced by the two distributing wallets in linked clusters, but the raw cohort majority is still adding.
- 24h volume of ~$406K is well above the empirical floor where fresh-pair entries have historically shown positive skew, and the liquidity-to-market-cap ratio (~23%) is workable for position exits at modest sizes.
ARCHIBROWN Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 20.9% of supply.
Is ARCHIBROWN Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
- Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.
ARCHIBROWN Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets
Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 4 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.00020995199999999998; nearest resistance: 0.00027265635248142846; Levels derived from 39 1h candles (~38 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice. Chart history could not yet support tested swing levels. The token is only about 1.6 days old. These lower-confidence planning levels are projected mechanically from the observed market price and must be rechecked as price history develops..
ARCHIBROWN Price and Market Data
Assessment: ARCHIBROWN is a brand-new PumpSwap memecoin, only ~1.6 days old, so no long-term track record exists and all structural signals should be treated as provisional. Mint and freeze authorities are both inactive, which is a meaningful positive — there is no current token-control risk. Holder concentration is elevated but not extreme: the top 20 non-pool wallets hold ~31% of supply across 18 whale wallets and 153 dolphins, with 8 of the 10 tracked whales actively accumulating and only 2 distributing; however, two identified wallet clusters ([redacted wallet] ↔ jd79…aFM holding ~5.8% combined, and [redacted wallet] ↔ Gykp…B9K holding ~4.8% combined) show direct token transfers between them, raising linked-wallet concerns. Sell pressure over ~10.6 hours shows net selling with whale and "big" wallet categories driving ~87% of sell volume, and the token is down ~39% over 24 hours — price is in a clear retracement after an early spike. Liquidity at ~$44.7K is adequate relative to the ~$195K market cap and clears the observed-loss threshold, with volume of ~$406K/24h well above the minimum empirical floor; despite the negative price action, the trading pair remains actively two-sided with buy/sell trade counts near parity at the aggregate level.
Reason: Two on-chain linked wallet clusters are actively distributing into accumulating paired wallets while price is in a sharp 24h decline, making the structural risk profile materially elevated despite positive volume and whale-count metrics.
Report limitations
- This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
- It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.
Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.
Analyzed: