Server-rendered summary

beluga Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.

Historical analysis snapshot. This report is more than six hours old. This snapshot is not a current buy or sell signal. Trade decisions, prices, levels and sellability may have changed. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

Exact Solana mint: 4qHAqsakh8oBgDpSHccmPHV4rPZDq1MgrQnsZ1QZpump

beluga Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: beluga has an Overall Health Score of 48 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: beluga has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

beluga Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • Beluga is only ~1.1 days old; every positive structural signal (whale accumulation, no dev selling, good concentration) reflects less than 28 hours of observable behaviour. No metric has been stress-tested across a meaningful time window.
  • With only $25.2k of DEX liquidity against $473k of 24h volume, the pool is being recycled roughly 19× daily. A coordinated exit by even a single mid-tier whale (1–2% of supply ≈ ~$900–$1,800 face value) would cause severe slippage.
  • Average whale holding time is 0.93 days; several of the largest wallets ([redacted wallet], 59Ee…dPo, CD4a…rtf) first appeared within the last 12–18 hours. Accumulation status may flip to distribution without warning given this cohort's recency.

beluga Risk and Health Signals

  • Neither mint nor freeze authority is active, and no dangerous token extensions are present. This removes the two most common rug-enabling controls for a token this young.
  • The deployer ([redacted wallet]) holds 2.1% of supply and has sold zero tokens in 1d/7d/30d windows, with a net positive change of +923k tokens in the last day, suggesting the creator is adding rather than exiting.
  • 24h buys: 15,987 vs. sells: 4,111 — a 3.9× ratio. The 6h and 1h windows both maintain ratios above 4×, indicating persistent retail demand relative to sell-side transaction count.

beluga Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 13.9% of supply.

Is beluga Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
  • Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

beluga Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 4 resistance areas were identified from 15m market candles; nearest support: 0.00009295947547403666; nearest resistance: 0.00010123814815295217; Levels derived from 111 15m candles (~28 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

beluga Price and Market Data

Assessment: Beluga is a 1.1-day-old Pump.fun graduation trading at a $91k market cap with $25k DEX liquidity — structurally thin and too young to judge long-term durability. Mint and freeze authorities are both revoked, which removes the key token-control risks. The top-10 non-pool concentration is a moderate 13.9%, with no identified insider clusters and zero confirmed dev selling; the deployer wallet ([redacted wallet]) holds 2.1% and has only added supply, not sold. All 10 tracked whale wallets are flagged as accumulating with no distributions observed, though average whale holding time is under 1 day, so this is speculative accumulation, not conviction holding. Liquidity at 27.6% of market cap is relatively healthy for a token this small, but the absolute depth of ~$25k means any sizable exit will move price materially; the token is too young and thin to rate confidently.

Report limitations

  • This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
  • It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.

Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.

Analyzed: