Server-rendered summary
C4T Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup
Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.
Historical analysis snapshot. This report is more than six hours old. This snapshot is not a current buy or sell signal. Trade decisions, prices, levels and sellability may have changed. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
Exact Solana mint: 2sLKA6PzFVjeTUaiKBCkDbDiS8MuoZAeXxZMgs9Apump
C4T Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: c4t.cat has an Overall Health Score of 26 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: c4t.cat has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.
C4T Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- The token is less than one day old (tokenAgeDays ≈ 0.99); every whale, every holder, and every price level is brand new with zero demonstrated durability. Any positive signal must be treated as unproven.
- Over the 22h window, whale-sized wallets account for 36% and big-sized wallets 47% of sell volume — combined 83% — indicating it is large holders, not small retail, driving outflows. Net volume is -84M tokens (negative) over the full window.
- Wallets [redacted wallet] and [redacted wallet] were repeatedly funded by the same two SOL wallets, together holding ~3.35% of supply; this suggests coordinated positioning that could exit simultaneously without warning.
C4T Risk and Health Signals
- The dev wallet ([redacted wallet]) shows zero sells across 1d/7d/30d windows; no mint or freeze authority is active, removing the most dangerous short-term rug vectors.
- Every tracked whale shows positive 1d change with status 'accumulating' and zero distributing whales; 50% are flagged never-sold. However, average holding duration is only 0.6 days, so this is very early-stage and unproven.
- The most recent 1h window shows 39 buys vs 38 sells and net volume of +$13.7M tokens, suggesting short-term selling exhaustion — though one hour of data on a day-old token is weak evidence.
C4T Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 18.6% of supply.
Is C4T Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
- Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.
C4T Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets
Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 4 resistance areas were identified from 15m market candles; nearest support: 0.00003086147259582201; nearest resistance: 0.00004129717195244237; Levels derived from 96 15m candles (~24 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice..
C4T Price and Market Data
Assessment: C4T is a Pump.fun token less than one day old ($34.5k market cap, $16.3k liquidity) that has collapsed ~83% from its intraday high, with the 6h candle still showing -32.7% even as the 1h has stabilised slightly (+9.15%). Mint and freeze authorities are inactive and the dev wallet ([redacted wallet]) has sold zero tokens, removing the two worst structural controls. However, all 10 whale wallets entered within the last 24 hours (average hold ~0.6 days), two are linked by shared SOL funding ([redacted wallet] and [redacted wallet], combined ~3.35%), and the decentralisation trend is marked as worsening. Sell pressure over the ~22h window is net negative (sell volume ~$663k vs buy ~$579k), with 83% of sell volume coming from whale and big-sized wallets — a deeply concerning quality-of-seller signal for a token this young. The sole identified support level ($0.00003086, -11% from current) has only one touch, and at a $34.5k market cap even modest sells will gap through it; the token is far too young to judge durability.
Reason: Whale and big-wallet sellers account for 83% of sell volume on a sub-one-day-old token with a single weak support level and worsening decentralisation — structural risk dominates despite the dev not selling.
Report limitations
- This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
- It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.
Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.
Analyzed: