Server-rendered summary
CATANA Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup
Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.
Historical analysis snapshot. This report is more than six hours old. This snapshot is not a current buy or sell signal. Trade decisions, prices, levels and sellability may have changed. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
Exact Solana mint: 55zP8YPAHNEiomqv1U8WxkQdR3mRqE2bAMpT2Moupump
CATANA Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: CATANA has an Overall Health Score of 15 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: CATANA has an extreme Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.
Trade Check: CATANA saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.
Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: unavailable. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.
CATANA Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- [redacted wallet] has sold ~58.6M tokens in swaps over the token's entire lifespan and retains only 0.38% of supply. This is a confirmed dev-exit pattern within hours of launch.
- CQeeQy…4LT holds 31.9% of supply but has shed ~130M tokens (a net change of −130M) within the first day — the single biggest source of sell pressure in the market.
- Top-10 wallets hold ~57% of supply and 13 whale wallets collectively control ~60.7%; a coordinated exit by even two or three of these wallets would be catastrophic for smaller holders.
CATANA Risk and Health Signals
- Neither mint nor freeze authority is active, removing the risk of supply inflation or wallet freezing by the deployer — a baseline structural positive.
- Nine whale wallets show positive net change since first seen; however, all first-seen dates are within the last few hours, so this reflects initial buys, not conviction holding — interpret with very low confidence.
- Rapid holder acquisition suggests meaningful launch-day interest, though many of those holders may already be underwater or planning to exit given the net-negative swap flow.
CATANA Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 56.9% of supply.
Is CATANA Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
- Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.
CATANA Price and Market Data
Assessment: CATANA is a pump.fun token less than four hours old with a $39.7K market cap and no DEX liquidity data available, making exit feasibility completely unverifiable. The top-10 holders control ~57% of supply excluding pools, with the single largest holder (CQeeQy…4LT) holding 31.9% and confirmed distributing — having shed ~130M tokens within the first day. The dev wallet ([redacted wallet]) is actively selling, having swapped out ~58.6M tokens in 7 days (which is the entire token lifetime), retaining only 0.38% — a classic early-exit pattern. Over the most recent ~3-hour window, whale and big-wallet cohorts account for 90%+ of sell volume, net flow is deeply negative (−311M tokens sold vs bought), and the decentralisation trend is flagged as worsening. No token control extensions are active, but the structural picture — confirmed dev selling, largest holder distributing, extreme concentration, zero liquidity data, and a token barely hours old — is unambiguously critical.
Reason: The dev wallet is confirmed selling within the token's first hours, the largest holder is actively distributing 130M+ tokens, whale cohorts dominate sell volume at 90%+, and there is no verifiable liquidity — every primary risk flag is simultaneously active.
Report limitations
- This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
- It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.
Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.
Analyzed: