collective Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

collective Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: collective has an Overall Health Score of 22 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: collective has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

collective Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• Whale and big-wallet sellers account for ~94.5% of sell volume over the 7.7-hour observable window, with net sell volume of -197M tokens. Sells outnumber buys 3:2 by count and the 1-hour window shows 59 sells vs 17 buys, indicating accelerating distribution rather than stabilisation.
• The rank-2 wallet (E7hLY…ygW, owner [redacted wallet]) holds 19.6% of supply — roughly $4.3K at current price — with zero historical activity visible, making intent opaque. A single exit attempt from this wallet would drain the $14.1K liquidity pool by ~30%, collapsing price.
• At ~0.4 days old, every signal is a snapshot with no durability evidence. All nine accumulating whales have held for fewer than 9 hours, which provides no meaningful signal about conviction or stickiness.

collective Risk and Health Signals

• Both mintAuthorityActive and freezeAuthorityActive are false with null authority addresses, eliminating the risk of supply inflation or wallet freezing by any party.
• The identified dev address ([redacted wallet]) holds 0% of supply and shows zero sell activity over all observable periods, meaning there is no active dev dump in progress.
• All nine tracked top whales show positive token balance changes, but all have held for fewer than 9 hours, making this 'accumulation' indistinguishable from initial buy-in by fresh wallets; stickiness is entirely unproven.

collective Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 34.1% of supply.

Is collective Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

collective Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 2 resistance areas were identified from 15m market candles; nearest support: 0.000021881325799244797; nearest resistance: 0.00002266045321069436; Levels derived from 40 15m candles (~10 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

collective Price and Market Data

Assessment: Collective (collective) is an ultra-fresh PumpSwap graduation token less than 10 hours old with a $22K market cap and $14.1K DEX liquidity — far too young to assess long-term durability. The largest non-pool wallet ([redacted wallet], rank-2 E7hLY…ygW) holds 19.6% of supply with zero observable change over all periods; intent remains unknown, but this single wallet represents an outsized exit-risk overhang at this market cap. Mint and freeze authorities are both inactive, which removes two structural attack vectors. However, sell pressure is severe: whale and big-wallet sellers account for ~94% of sell volume over the observable window, sells outnumber buys 3.6:1 on trade count over 7.7 hours, and price is already -43.8% on the 24h period. Liquidity at 64% of market cap provides reasonable depth relative to cap, but with a single wallet holding ~20% of supply and ~$4.4K equivalent, exits for that holder would be catastrophic for price. This token is in an acute distribution phase and is too young to judge whether any floor has formed.

Reason: Severe and accelerating sell pressure from whale and large-wallet holders, a 19.6% supply overhang from an unidentified wallet, and a worsening decentralisation trend on a sub-10-hour-old token with $14K of thin liquidity make current participation indefensible.

Report limitations

• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.