Server-rendered summary

CXMT Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.

Historical analysis snapshot. This report is more than six hours old. This snapshot is not a current buy or sell signal. Trade decisions, prices, levels and sellability may have changed. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

Exact Solana mint: 7gjyyCrZeMqkQxLzwj6Ye1dWpqX7Ue5rtWxFWaKK8PDG

CXMT Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: 长鑫科技 CXMT has an Overall Health Score of 11 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: 长鑫科技 CXMT has an extreme Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Trade Check: 长鑫科技 CXMT saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: unavailable. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.

CXMT Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • [redacted wallet] holds 80% and EW5UQy…tLE holds 19.06% of total supply, both outside any pool. Either wallet dumping even a fraction of its holdings would collapse the price with no liquidity to absorb it.
  • The PumpSwap pair reports $0 liquidity against a $1.3M market cap. This means there is no verifiable exit route for any position of meaningful size; the $52M volume figure cannot be reconciled with this and must be treated with extreme scepticism.
  • At roughly 1 day old, there is no observable durability, no holding-duration data for any wallet, and no basis to assess whether current structure reflects long-term intent or a pre-dump setup.

CXMT Risk and Health Signals

  • Neither mint nor freeze authority is active and both are set to null, eliminating the risk of new supply creation or token freezing by a controller.
  • The identified dev address shows zero selling across all time windows, though the dev address resolves to the system program ([redacted wallet]), suggesting the actual deployer is not identified.
  • Only 7 sellers totalling ~$76K in sell volume over ~20 hours, none of them linked to the top two mega-whales — however this means little given the two whales have not needed to sell yet.

CXMT Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 99.5% of supply.

Is CXMT Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
  • Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

CXMT Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 1 resistance area were identified from 5m market candles; nearest support: 0.0000072343318219308685; nearest resistance: 0.00001679379603093737; Levels derived from 57 5m candles (~5 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

CXMT Price and Market Data

Assessment: CXMT is a ~1-day-old Solana memecoin with a catastrophically concentrated holder structure: a single unlabelled wallet ([redacted wallet]) holds 80% of total supply and a second (EW5UQy…tLE) holds 19%, meaning two wallets together control 99.06% of all tokens — entirely outside any pool. Reported on-chain liquidity is $0, making any meaningful exit for large holders structurally impossible through the current DEX pair, despite nominal 24-hour volume of $52M which cannot be reconciled with $0 liquidity and only 71 holders. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive, which eliminates code-level rug vectors, but the supply concentration itself represents an overwhelming structural risk on a token with no track record. The token is too young (≈1 day) to assess any durability, and the extreme two-whale dominance with no identifiable labels, no holding-duration data, and zero liquidity depth makes this indefensible for normal participation.

Reason: Two unlabelled wallets hold 99% of supply with zero on-chain liquidity and no track record, making any meaningful exit structurally impossible and the setup indistinguishable from a pre-dump configuration.

Report limitations

  • This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
  • It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.

Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.

Analyzed: