MemeAssist

CYBERLEEK Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: CyberLeek saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: CyberLeek received an Overall Health Score of 17 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: CyberLeek received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: 75MdfqTCDi5jswRmMPVA65fTMEQb63CJyBMs1mXQRYKu

Stale: analysed 72 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

One wallet controls 80% of the supply

Health Score
17/100
Rug risk
75/100 · Extreme

One wallet controls 80% of the supply. Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing. A valid measured setup is not established.

  • Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing.
  • One wallet controls 80% of the supply
  • A valid measured setup is not established.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: CyberLeek is ~16 hours old with a structurally broken holder base: one unlabeled wallet holds 80% of supply and a second holds 18.8%, together controlling 98.8% of the float, with the top 20 wallets holding 99.997%. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive which removes one class of risk, but liquidity, market cap and price-change data are all null, so exit feasibility cannot be verified from the data provided. Recent flow looks superficially bullish (8,929 buys vs 13 sells in ~12.7h), but 95% of sell volume came from a single wallet (unlabelled wallet) that fully exited after ~15 hours holding, and another wallet dumped its entire 4.85% share — classic launch-window insider skim behaviour on a token where two wallets still hold ~99%. Health score trajectory (14 → 16) shows no meaningful improvement, and the token is far too young to judge durability regardless. Structural risk here is dominated by two anonymous mega-holders whose next move alone determines whether this exists tomorrow.

Exact Solana mint: 75MdfqTCDi5jswRmMPVA65fTMEQb63CJyBMs1mXQRYKu. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

CYBERLEEK Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: CyberLeek received an Overall Health Score of 17 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: CyberLeek received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

CYBERLEEK Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • unlabelled wallet holds 80.0% and unlabelled wallet holds 18.8%. Either wallet selling even a fraction of its position would overwhelm any conceivable liquidity on a token this size.
  • Wallet unlabelled wallet sold ~7.46B tokens (95% of all sell volume in the window) and fully exited after ~15 hours, and unlabelled wallet dumped another 4.85% share. This is active distribution behaviour into the launch bid, not organic churn.
  • liquidityUsd, marketCapUsd and priceChange fields are all null, so exit depth cannot be verified. On a Meteora DBC pair less than a day old with 99% concentrated supply, this is a critical blind spot.

CYBERLEEK Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Both mintAuthorityActive and freezeAuthorityActive are false, removing the risk of dilution or wallet freezing from the contract level.
  • The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-08-24 10:57 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure.
  • 8,929 buys from 1,798 unique wallets vs 13 sells in ~12.7h looks bullish, but this is standard launch-window behaviour and does not offset the two-wallet supply lock.

CYBERLEEK Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 99.38% of supply.

Is CYBERLEEK Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: a possible match was detected.
  • Sellability check: inconclusive.

CYBERLEEK Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this CYBERLEEK report analyse?

CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK) is identified by Solana mint 75MdfqTCDi5jswRmMPVA65fTMEQb63CJyBMs1mXQRYKu; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 17/100 for CYBERLEEK, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for CYBERLEEK as 'Extreme'.

What is the entry assessment for CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK)?

The entry assessment for CYBERLEEK is avoid.

How much liquidity does CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK) have?

Liquidity for CYBERLEEK was not established in this saved analysis.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK)?

At the saved check for CYBERLEEK, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 99.38% of the total supply of CYBERLEEK.

Was a sell route found for CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK) in the saved analysis?

Sell-route availability for CYBERLEEK was not established in the saved analysis.

When was the AI analysis for CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for CYBERLEEK was last updated on 24/08/2026, 10:57:22 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings