MemeAssist

CYBERLEEK Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: CyberLeek saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: CyberLeek received an Overall Health Score of 11 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: CyberLeek received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: AZCssmGfkQmGpefxPBXUkmu6nTBd76qmbJhkYS1chXNY

Stale: analysed 72 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

One wallet controls 84% of the supply

Health Score
11/100
Rug risk
75/100 · Extreme

One wallet controls 84% of the supply. Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing. A valid measured setup is not established.

  • Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing.
  • One wallet controls 84% of the supply
  • A valid measured setup is not established.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: CyberLeek is ~17 hours old with a market cap of $0.04, no reported liquidity data, and effectively no price discovery yet. One wallet (unlabelled wallet) holds 84.4% of supply and the top 6 wallets control 98.8%, leaving 88 remaining wallets to share ~1.2% — this is textbook launch-wallet concentration. Mint and freeze authorities are revoked, but that does nothing to offset the supply structure. Over the last ~13.6 hours a single top holder (unlabelled wallet) sold ~2.29B tokens (55% of sell volume) and another wallet (unlabelled wallet) fully exited after dumping 1.26B, together accounting for ~85% of all sell flow — this looks like insider distribution masked by 5,945 tiny buy trades. A direct token-transfer link between the #4 holder (unlabelled wallet, 2.55%) and another whale (GvAY…5kB) confirms at least one cluster. With no meaningful liquidity data, an unreadable price snapshot, and structural risks dominating, this remains untradeable on the visible information.

Exact Solana mint: AZCssmGfkQmGpefxPBXUkmu6nTBd76qmbJhkYS1chXNY. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

CYBERLEEK Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: CyberLeek received an Overall Health Score of 11 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: CyberLeek received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

CYBERLEEK Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • unlabelled wallet alone controls 84.4% of supply and the top 6 wallets hold 98.8%. Any single decision by these wallets can wipe out the market.
  • Top holder unlabelled wallet sold ~2.29B tokens (55% of all sell volume) in the last ~13 hours, and whale-sized sellers account for 97.6% of sell flow — classic insider bleed pattern behind heavy retail buy counts.
  • Direct token transfers link unlabelled wallet (2.55%) and GvAY…5kB (0.09%), evidence of suspected coordinated wallets among the top 10 — treat other unlabeled whales with the same suspicion. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only.

CYBERLEEK Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Both authorities are inactive, removing the classic supply-inflation and freeze-your-wallet rug vectors.
  • 5,945 buy trades vs 39 sell trades looks bullish on the surface, but the sell side is dominated by four whale wallets offloading into a large number of small buyers — this is a distribution shape, not organic demand.
  • The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-08-24 22:00 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure.

CYBERLEEK Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 99.94% of supply.

Is CYBERLEEK Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: a possible match was detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.

CYBERLEEK Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this CYBERLEEK report analyse?

CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK) is identified by Solana mint AZCssmGfkQmGpefxPBXUkmu6nTBd76qmbJhkYS1chXNY; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 11/100 for CYBERLEEK, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for CYBERLEEK as 'Extreme'.

What is the entry assessment for CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK)?

The entry assessment for CYBERLEEK is avoid.

How much liquidity does CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK) have?

Liquidity for CYBERLEEK was not established in this saved analysis.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK)?

At the saved check for CYBERLEEK, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 99.94% of the total supply of CYBERLEEK.

Was a sell route found for CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK) in the saved analysis?

A sell route was observed for CYBERLEEK.

When was the AI analysis for CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for CYBERLEEK was last updated on 24/08/2026, 22:00:46 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings