GROW Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

GROW Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Evergrow has an Overall Health Score of 22 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Evergrow has an extreme Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Trade Check: Evergrow saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: unavailable. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.

GROW Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• Four wallets (3zMk…oHP, 86X4…KhT, CDgR…kdN, CrMe…goV) are linked by direct on-chain token transfers and together hold ~70% of supply; the single largest wallet alone holds 50%. This is a classic rug-setup concentration with an identified coordination fingerprint, not anonymous exchange custody.
• The 30-day net whale flow is -290.6M tokens, meaning the cluster has already distributed approximately 85% of its initial aggregate position into the market. The remaining ~70% of supply still held by cluster wallets represents continued potential sell pressure at any price recovery.
• With 42 holders total and 100% of supply accounted for in the top 20 wallets, there is virtually no retail distribution; any cluster exit will face near-zero buy-side depth from organic holders and must rely entirely on the ~$41.6k pool liquidity.

GROW Risk and Health Signals

• Both mintAuthorityActive and freezeAuthorityActive are false with null authority addresses, eliminating the risk of supply dilution or wallet freezing by the deployer. This is a necessary (but far from sufficient) hygiene check that passes.
• With ~$41.6k in DEX liquidity against a $73.4k market cap, the pool covers ~57% of market cap, meaning exits by small holders are mechanically feasible; however, any cluster wallet dumping its remaining position would drain the pool entirely.
• The 1-hour window shows 12 buys vs 6 sells and a +3.78% price uptick, but total 1-hour buy volume is only ~$1.5k USD equivalent — statistically negligible against the structural sell overhang and could reflect a single small buyer.

GROW Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 71.0% of supply.

Is GROW Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

GROW Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 4 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.00007273301819644428; nearest resistance: 0.00007797645986456732; Levels derived from 45 1h candles (~12.0 days) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

GROW Price and Market Data

Assessment: GROW is a 12-day-old micro-cap ($73k market cap) on Raydium with only 42 holders and extreme supply concentration: a four-wallet cluster confirmed by direct on-chain token transfers controls ~70% of circulating supply (50% in 3zMk…oHP alone), with no mint or freeze authority active. Liquidity of ~$41.6k is healthy relative to the tiny market cap and authorities are clean, but the clustered insider bloc represents a structural rug vector that dwarfs any positive signal. Sell pressure over the past 44 hours shows net negative flow with whale and large-wallet sellers dominating recent volume, and the 24h price is down 16.25%. The token is far too young (12 days) and too thinly held to assess long-term durability, and the 30-day net whale flow is deeply negative (-290M tokens), reflecting heavy early distribution by the cluster.

Reason: A four-wallet cluster confirmed by direct on-chain token transfers controls 70% of supply in a 42-holder token with active sustained distribution — the structural rug conditions are unambiguous and no positive signal offsets this insider concentration risk.

Report limitations

• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.