~4° Coin Price, Rug Risk & On-Chain Analysis

~4° Token Analysis Summary

Overall Health Score: fartman has an Overall Health Score of 22 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: fartman has an extreme Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Trade Check: fartman Trade Check decision: avoid. Token safety: dangerous. Trade Setup quality: unavailable. Condition to watch: Reconsider only after deterministic danger clears.

Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: unavailable. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.

~4° Coin Price and Market Data

Assessment: Fartman (~4°) is an ultra-fresh PumpSwap token less than 15 minutes old with a $73K market cap and $21K in DEX liquidity. The most critical observable fact is that the developer wallet ([redacted wallet]) has already sold its entire position — approximately 97.5 million tokens — within minutes of launch, a textbook early-exit pattern. A linked cluster of two wallets ([redacted wallet] and 71PCu…UtQ, confirmed by direct token transfers) is actively distributing, together shedding over 44 million tokens while still holding a combined ~3.8% of supply. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive, which is a structural positive, but at this age — under 0.01 days — no track record exists whatsoever and every structural risk (dev exit, insider clusters, thin liquidity relative to volume, concentrated whale cohort with zero proven holding duration) must be weighted heavily. The token is far too young to judge long-term durability and the dev's full exit is a decisive red flag.

Reason: The developer has fully sold their entire position within minutes of launch, a confirmed insider cluster is actively distributing, and the token has no track record whatsoever — the combination of zero dev alignment, coordinated selling, and extreme immaturity makes participation indefensible at thi

~4° Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• The creator wallet sold approximately 97.5 million tokens within minutes of launch and currently holds 0% of supply. A dev who exits immediately removes any alignment with token longevity and signals opportunistic launch behaviour.
• Two wallets with confirmed direct token transfers between them ([redacted wallet] and 71PCu…UtQ) are classified as distributing, having shed a combined ~44 million tokens while retaining a combined ~3.76% of supply. Coordinated insider selling alongside a dev exit is the clearest slow-drain pattern.
• The average whale holding period is under 0.009 days (~13 minutes) and not a single whale is flagged as never-sold. There is no evidence of any long-term holder conviction anywhere in the top cohort.

~4° Coin Health Signals

• Neither mint nor freeze authority is active and no dangerous token extensions are present, meaning the supply cannot be inflated and holders cannot be frozen. This is a necessary but not sufficient structural safeguard.
• 382 buy transactions versus 182 sell transactions in the observed window suggests broad retail interest is still arriving, though volume is dominated in token-unit terms by large sellers, limiting this signal's significance.
• The creator wallet sold ~97.5 million tokens (its entire known position) within minutes of token creation. This is the single most actionable insider signal available and overrides all short-term buy-side noise.

~4° Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 19.7% of supply.

Is ~4° Coin Safe?

• Creator risk check: prior blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.