Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.
Historical analysis snapshot.
At a glance: FIFAcom (FIFA) is an extremely new token — less than 9 hours old — with essentially zero observable market activity: null market cap, null liquidity, zero 24-hour volume, and a price so small it is effectively unmeasurable. Two unlabelled wallets (unlabelled wallet and unlabelled wallet) together hold 99.10% of total supply, creating a catastrophic concentration risk with no way to verify whether these are insiders, team wallets, or suspected coordinated actors. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive, which is a minor positive, but with no liquidity data, a median wallet balance of 233 tokens, and only 65 holders in total, exit feasibility is near zero. At this age and with this structure, this token is too young and too concentrated to assess any long-term durability whatsoever.
Exact Solana mint: 4GwcAPcnFD3QuksR8AaEG5YETw7pA7BHRAaQx4mn4uvJ. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.
FIFA Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: FIFAcom received an Overall Health Score of 8 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: FIFAcom received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.
What changed between saved analyses?
No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.
FIFA Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- Wallet unlabelled wallet holds 80% and unlabelled wallet holds 19.1% of total supply — together controlling 99.1% between just two unidentified addresses. Any suspected coordinated sell from either wallet would be a near-total rug with no meaningful counterweight. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only.
- Liquidity is reported as null and market cap is null — there is no observable DEX depth against which supply can be sold. Exit feasibility at any meaningful size is effectively zero.
- With tokenAgeDays of ~0.38, there is no price history, no holder trend, and no behavioral data to assess durability. Every structural risk carries maximum weight and every positive signal carries minimum weight at this age.
FIFA Risk and Health Signals
- Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
- Both mintAuthorityActive and freezeAuthorityActive are false with null authority addresses, meaning new tokens cannot be minted and wallets cannot be frozen — removing two common rug-pull control vectors.
- activeDangerousExtensions is empty and no dormant extension warnings are present, so there are no program-level backdoors identified in the token contract.
- Over the first ~6.2 hours, buy volume of ~26.8 billion tokens across 2,977 trades dwarfs sell volume of ~30,695 tokens — but with null liquidity and null market cap, this ratio is uninterpretable and likely reflects internal token accounting rather than genuine external demand.
FIFA Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 99.55% of supply.
Is FIFA Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: inconclusive.
FIFA Risk Analysis Questions
Which Solana token does this FIFA report analyse?
FIFAcom (FIFA) is identified by Solana mint 4GwcAPcnFD3QuksR8AaEG5YETw7pA7BHRAaQx4mn4uvJ; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.
What is the AI health score for FIFAcom (FIFA)?
The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 8/100 for FIFA, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.
What is the automated rug risk level for FIFAcom (FIFA)?
The on-chain checks rated rug risk for FIFA as 'Extreme'.
What is the entry assessment for FIFAcom (FIFA)?
The entry assessment for FIFA is avoid.
How much liquidity does FIFAcom (FIFA) have?
Liquidity for FIFA was not established in this saved analysis.
Are the mint and freeze authorities active for FIFAcom (FIFA)?
At the saved check for FIFA, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.
What is the top-10 holder concentration for FIFAcom (FIFA)?
At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 99.55% of the total supply of FIFA.
Was a sell route found for FIFAcom (FIFA) in the saved analysis?
Sell-route availability for FIFA was not established in the saved analysis.
When was the AI analysis for FIFAcom (FIFA) last updated?
The on-chain analysis for FIFA was last updated on 31/08/2026, 00:55:26 GMT.