Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

FILLED Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.

Historical analysis snapshot. This report is more than six hours old. This snapshot is not a current buy or sell signal. Trade decisions, prices, levels and sellability may have changed. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

At a glance: FILLED (filled.cards) is a brand-new Pump.fun graduate — less than 2 days old — trading at a ~$400K market cap with $76K in DEX liquidity (~19% of market cap), which is reasonable depth for its stage. Mint and freeze authorities are both revoked, removing the two most common structural controls. The holder base spans 3,373 wallets with the top-20 non-pool holders controlling ~31% of supply; 21 whale wallets collectively hold ~33% of supply, and 7 of the 10 tracked whales are actively accumulating, with a positive net whale inflow of ~16.5M tokens over the past 24 hours. However, one on-chain cluster — wallets FtfFoB6k…, 34F9PBzX… and 5VH7f8Jv… — collectively holds ~6.3% of supply and is linked by direct token transfers, a real but not extreme concentration risk. The decentralisation trend is flagged as worsening, and price has fallen sharply (-66% over 24h), indicating the token launched into heavy early selling before stabilising. The sell-pressure breakdown shows mostly small retail exits and no identified dev wallet activity, with slow-rug risk rated low. At under 2 days old, there is no track record; the score trajectory (44→47→current) shows marginal improvement but no durability has been demonstrated yet, so enthusiasm must be capped and structural risks weighted heavily.

Exact Solana mint: 8dBnKHwNYH3hz2fFTJczVwzBTpJFAMtc53k3uA4zpump. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

FILLED Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: filled.cards has an Overall Health Score of 47 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: filled.cards has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

FILLED Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • The token is fewer than 2 days old with only ~45 candles of price history. All structural assessments carry very low confidence and any positive signal must be treated as provisional until weeks of consistent behaviour are demonstrated.
  • Three wallets connected by direct on-chain token transfers collectively control ~6.3% of supply. If coordinated, a simultaneous exit at current liquidity levels would represent meaningful price impact on the ~$76K pool.
  • Price fell approximately 66% over the prior 24 hours, indicating the launch was followed by heavy distribution. The market is stabilising at much lower levels, but the extent of early selling raises questions about the quality of initial buyers.

FILLED Risk and Health Signals

  • Both mint and freeze authority are null and inactive, meaning no party can create additional supply or freeze wallets. This removes two of the most common rug-pull vectors.
  • The observable whale cohort shows 7 wallets adding tokens and 0 distributing over the past 24 hours, with a net inflow of ~16.5M tokens into tracked whale wallets in the last day alone.
  • Over the ~44-hour observation window, buy volume (~$25.2M tokens) exceeded sell volume (~$19.2M tokens), with a buy/sell trade ratio of 214:202 — a modest net buyer edge.

FILLED Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 20.1% of supply.

Is FILLED Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
  • Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

FILLED Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 4 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.000396576; nearest resistance: 0.000433755; Levels derived from 45 1h candles (~44 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice. Chart history could not yet support tested swing levels. The token is only about 1.9 days old. These lower-confidence planning levels are projected mechanically from the observed market price and must be rechecked as price history develops..

FILLED Analysis Rationale

Reason: A cluster-linked concentrated holder base, a severe 24h price drawdown, and fewer than 2 days of on-chain history make structural confidence very low despite positive whale accumulation signals and clean token controls.

Report limitations

  • This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
  • It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.

Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.

FILLED Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this FILLED report analyse?

filled.cards (FILLED) is identified by Solana mint 8dBnKHwNYH3hz2fFTJczVwzBTpJFAMtc53k3uA4zpump. Names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens; verify the mint address before trading. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-04T13:41:20.810Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

What is the AI health score for filled.cards (FILLED)?

The AI health score for FILLED is 47/100. This automated score is computed by analyzing on-chain behavior, holder distribution, and liquidity. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-04T13:41:20.810Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

What is the automated rug risk level for filled.cards (FILLED)?

Based on automated on-chain risk checks, FILLED has a rug risk level of 'low'. Always exercise extreme caution and do not treat this as financial advice. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-04T13:41:20.810Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

What is the AI trading verdict for filled.cards (FILLED)?

The automated AI verdict for FILLED is 'neutral'. This indicates the overall on-chain sentiment based on liquidity, whale activity, and smart contract safety. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-04T13:41:20.810Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

How much liquidity does filled.cards (FILLED) have?

The liquidity recorded in the saved analysis for FILLED was $76,459. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-04T13:41:20.810Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for filled.cards (FILLED)?

For FILLED, the mint authority is revoked and the freeze authority is revoked. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-04T13:41:20.810Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for filled.cards (FILLED)?

The top 10 holders control 20.1% of the total supply of FILLED. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-04T13:41:20.810Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

Is filled.cards (FILLED) currently sellable?

Yes, automated checks indicate a sell route exists for FILLED at this time. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-04T13:41:20.810Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

When was the AI analysis for filled.cards (FILLED) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for FILLED was last updated on 04/10/2026, 13:41:20 GMT. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-04T13:41:20.810Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

Analyzed: