Server-rendered summary
Gary Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup
Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.
Exact Solana mint: 8ZCmwpW3MtC5UpNcZf7U4HMvRNTo71syU11BDiAFpump
Gary Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: Gary the Cat has an Overall Health Score of 24 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: Gary the Cat has an extreme Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.
Trade Check: Gary the Cat Trade Check decision: avoid. Token safety: dangerous. Trade Setup quality: weak. Condition to watch: Reconsider only after deterministic danger clears.
Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: weak. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.
Gary Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- Price is 95.4% below its sustained closing-price high observed within the same 34-hour pool window (~$0.00253 peak). This is confirmed market damage — not proof of a rug, but the structural context is deeply unfavorable for new buyers.
- The identified PumpFun creator (high-confidence) has sold all ~32.9M tokens and holds 0% remaining. Complete dev exit eliminates any incentive for ongoing project support and is a primary structural red flag.
- At only ~1.4 days old, there is no durable price history, no tested support/resistance levels, and no evidence of holder stickiness. All key levels are projected heuristics, not observed swing points.
Gary Risk and Health Signals
- Both mint and freeze authorities are null and inactive. There is no mechanism for the issuer to inflate supply or freeze holder wallets, which removes one category of structural rug risk.
- The largest non-pool holder controls only ~0.93% of supply, and the top 20 non-pool wallets hold ~7.1% combined across 3,645 holders. No single actor dominates the circulating supply.
- In the most recent 1-hour window, buy volume (~$37.9M tokens) exceeded sell volume (~$35.6M tokens) with 144 buys vs 47 sells, indicating near-term demand is currently absorbing supply.
Gary Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 4.1% of supply.
Is Gary Safe?
- Creator risk check: prior blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
- Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.
Gary Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets
Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 4 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.00010522216546416183; nearest resistance: 0.00012264; Levels derived from 34 1h candles (~33 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice. Chart history could not yet support tested swing levels. The token is only about 1.4 days old. These lower-confidence planning levels are projected mechanically from the observed market price and must be rechecked as price history develops..
Gary Price and Market Data
Assessment: Gary the Cat (Gary) is a 1.4-day-old PumpFun memecoin that has suffered a severe historical price collapse of 95.4% from its sustained closing-price high of $0.00253 down to the current $0.000117 — this structural market damage leads the assessment regardless of any short-term recovery signals. The creator wallet ([redacted wallet]) has fully exited, having sold ~32.9M tokens in the past 7 days with zero remaining balance, confirming complete insider distribution. No mint or freeze authorities are active, which is a positive structural note. Supply concentration excluding the pool is remarkably flat — the top non-pool holder owns just 0.93% and the top 20 non-pool wallets hold only ~7.1% collectively, spread across 3,645 holders — but all 10 tracked whale wallets are extremely young (avg ~0.86 days), so "accumulating" status reflects recency, not conviction. Liquidity of ~$33.4K against a $116K market cap is thin, and the ~6.6-hour sell window shows net negative flow (-$49.3M tokens), with large sellers (0.1–1% size) driving 57.7% of sell volume. The token is too young to assess long-term durability, and the confirmed creator exit combined with a 95%+ price collapse makes this a high-risk context at best.
Reason: The confirmed creator full-exit combined with a 95%+ historical price collapse from peak makes this structurally damaged; only the clean authorities and thin-but-positive 1H flow prevent an outright avoid rating. Severe historical price collapse: 95.38% below a sustained closing-price high in the observed 34-hour window. This is market damage, not proof of a rug. Severe historical price collapse: 95.38% below a sustained closing-price high in the observed 34-hour window. This is market damage, not proof of a rug. Severe historical price collapse: 95.38% below a sustained closing-price high in the observed 34-hour window. This is market damage, not proof of a rug.
Report limitations
- This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
- It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.
Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.
Analyzed: