Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.
GENESIS Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup
Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.
Historical analysis snapshot. This report is more than six hours old. This snapshot is not a current buy or sell signal. Trade decisions, prices, levels and sellability may have changed. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
At a glance: GENESIS ([redacted wallet]) is an ultra-fresh PumpSwap memecoin less than one day old with a $23K market cap and $2.1M in 24-hour volume — a severe volume-to-cap disproportion that reflects aggressive early speculation rather than organic adoption. Historical price risk is unavailable due to insufficient chart history, so prior peak damage cannot be ruled out; the token has shed 50% of its value over the last 24 hours and 48% over six hours, indicating rapid post-launch selling. Holder concentration is meaningful but not extreme: the top 20 non-pool wallets hold ~31% of supply across 17 whale wallets (each >1% individually), all of which are freshly accumulated within the last 0.8 days — no long-term sticky holders exist, and the decentralisation trend is described as worsening. The developer wallet could not be identified, leaving insider risk partially unknown; however, no active mint or freeze authority is present, and no wallet clusters or slow-rug signals were detected. Liquidity at ~$13.8K is thin relative to the market cap and creates real exit-feasibility risk for large holders. The token is far too young to judge long-term durability, and the structural picture — sharp price decline, thin liquidity, unknown creator, concentration in brand-new wallets, and heavy whale/big-wallet sell pressure — warrants a high-risk classification.
Exact Solana mint: CSEd3Pi5WZL7w5vmwNjDVXv8poAqSv2Dn1as1erUpump. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.
GENESIS Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: Genesis has an Overall Health Score of 30 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: Genesis has a high Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.
Trade Check: Genesis saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: weak.
Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: weak. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.
GENESIS Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- At under 0.8 days old, GENESIS has no demonstrable durability. All whale positions were opened within the last ~19 hours, meaning no holder has been tested through a consolidation or recovery cycle.
- Price is down 50% over 24 hours and 48% over 6 hours, with continued sell-side net flow in the most recent 1-hour window (~$23.9K sells vs ~$7.2K buys). Historical peak damage cannot be assessed due to unavailable chart data.
- No creator wallet was identified; insider exposure is structurally unknown. This makes it impossible to confirm whether the team has exited or is still holding, a material gap in risk assessment.
GENESIS Risk and Health Signals
- Both mint and freeze authorities are null and inactive, meaning the supply is fixed and no party can freeze wallets — a baseline structural positive that limits certain exploit vectors.
- Over $2.1M in 24-hour volume against a $23K market cap (~9,000% turnover) indicates intense trader interest, though this also reflects speculation rather than durable demand and has been accompanied by a 50% price decline.
- The cluster analysis returned zero results and slow-rug risk is rated low, meaning no coordinated insider drip-selling pattern was observable from available data.
GENESIS Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 20.9% of supply.
Is GENESIS Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: a possible match was detected.
- Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
- Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.
GENESIS Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets
Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 2 resistance areas were identified from 15m market candles; nearest support: 0.0000234528; nearest resistance: 0.00002481558999474466; Levels derived from 77 15m candles (~19 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice. Chart history could not yet support tested swing levels. The token is only about 0.8 days old. These lower-confidence planning levels are projected mechanically from the observed market price and must be rechecked as price history develops..
GENESIS Analysis Rationale
Reason: A sub-day-old token down 50% with unknown creator identity, thin liquidity, dominant large-wallet selling, and no track record of holder stickiness presents a structurally high-risk picture that cannot be assessed with any conviction.
Report limitations
- This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
- It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.
Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.
GENESIS Risk Analysis Questions
Which Solana token does this GENESIS report analyse?
Genesis (GENESIS) is identified by Solana mint CSEd3Pi5WZL7w5vmwNjDVXv8poAqSv2Dn1as1erUpump. Names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens; verify the mint address before trading. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-05T20:19:31.324Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
What is the AI health score for Genesis (GENESIS)?
The AI health score for GENESIS is 30/100. This automated score is computed by analyzing on-chain behavior, holder distribution, and liquidity. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-05T20:19:31.324Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
What is the automated rug risk level for Genesis (GENESIS)?
Based on automated on-chain risk checks, GENESIS has a rug risk level of 'high'. Always exercise extreme caution and do not treat this as financial advice. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-05T20:19:31.324Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
What is the AI trading verdict for Genesis (GENESIS)?
The automated AI verdict for GENESIS is 'weak'. This indicates the overall on-chain sentiment based on liquidity, whale activity, and smart contract safety. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-05T20:19:31.324Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
How much liquidity does Genesis (GENESIS) have?
The liquidity recorded in the saved analysis for GENESIS was $13,788. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-05T20:19:31.324Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
Are the mint and freeze authorities active for Genesis (GENESIS)?
For GENESIS, the mint authority is revoked and the freeze authority is revoked. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-05T20:19:31.324Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
What is the top-10 holder concentration for Genesis (GENESIS)?
The top 10 holders control 20.9% of the total supply of GENESIS. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-05T20:19:31.324Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
Is Genesis (GENESIS) currently sellable?
Yes, automated checks indicate a sell route exists for GENESIS at this time. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-05T20:19:31.324Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
When was the AI analysis for Genesis (GENESIS) last updated?
The on-chain analysis for GENESIS was last updated on 05/10/2026, 20:19:31 GMT. These are saved analysis observations dated 2026-10-05T20:19:31.324Z, not live market conditions. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
Analyzed: