Server-rendered summary

GOOGL Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.

Historical analysis snapshot. This report is more than six hours old. This snapshot is not a current buy or sell signal. Trade decisions, prices, levels and sellability may have changed. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

Exact Solana mint: 3DKWr3sqntFMHiG2YxbmsQeCNJhCHmh6NK2ZazCDcUqA

GOOGL Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Google has an Overall Health Score of 10 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Google has an extreme Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Trade Check: Google saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: unavailable. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.

GOOGL Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • Reported liquidityUsd is $0, meaning there is no observable pool depth. Any attempt to exit even a small position would face catastrophic slippage or complete inability to sell.
  • Two unidentified wallets ([redacted wallet] and 8yxWp…PtQ) hold 80.0% and 18.9% of supply respectively — ~98.9% combined. A single decision by either wallet to sell would annihilate any remaining market cap.
  • The token has shed 86% of its value within its first day of trading and shows zero transaction activity in the last 6 hours, indicating the market has effectively shut down.

GOOGL Risk and Health Signals

  • Both mint and freeze authorities are null and inactive, removing the ability for any party to inflate supply or freeze holder wallets — standard minimum safety bar met.
  • The identified dev address shows zero sell activity, and no slow-rug signals are flagged; however, the dev address resolves to the system program (all-ones address), so this data point is unreliable as a genuine safety signal.
  • 100% of sell volume by value came from small holders (<0.01% of supply), and neither of the two dominant wallets has sold any tokens — the lowest-risk seller profile possible, though this may simply reflect the absence of a liquid exit route.

GOOGL Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 99.4% of supply.

Is GOOGL Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
  • Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

GOOGL Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 0 support areas and 0 resistance areas were identified from 5m market candles; Levels derived from 41 5m candles (~4 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

GOOGL Price and Market Data

Assessment: GOOGL ([redacted wallet]) is a ~1-day-old PumpSwap token with a $203k market cap and, critically, zero reported DEX liquidity — meaning there is no observable pool depth against which any position can be safely exited. Two unlabelled wallets ([redacted wallet] at 80.0% and 8yxWp…PtQ at 18.9%) collectively hold ~98.9% of supply, a catastrophically concentrated structure that has not changed since the prior analysis; neither has sold, but neither needs to have sold yet to represent existential exit risk. The token is now roughly 25 hours old and recorded an -86% 24-hour price decline, with zero buy or sell transactions in the last 6 hours and 1 hour, suggesting trading has effectively halted. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive, removing two rug vectors, but zero liquidity combined with two wallets controlling virtually all supply makes any entry indefensible regardless of the lack of active selling.

Reason: Zero DEX liquidity combined with two unidentified wallets controlling 98.9% of supply and a dead trading market makes participation structurally indefensible.

Report limitations

  • This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
  • It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.

Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.

Analyzed: