Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.
Historical analysis snapshot.
At a glance: Hellcat (Lucifer) is a 30-day-old micro-cap token on PumpSwap with a market cap of ~$3,677 and liquidity of ~$4,344 — the liquidity actually exceeds market cap, which reflects near-complete token drainage into the pool rather than genuine depth. The dev wallet shows zero activity and both mint and freeze authorities are revoked, removing the most acute structural threats, but the token is effectively dead from a trading perspective: 24-hour volume is $3.36 with zero buys and only 2 sells, and no support levels exist in the technical data. Over the full observable window, sell volume has exceeded buy volume by roughly 2.3:1 ($120M token-units sold vs $52M bought), with whale-sized wallets accounting for over 81% of all selling, and nearly every top seller has fully exited. Ten current whales are all holding with no change over 1 or 7 days, but their aggregate 30-day inflow of ~80.9M token-units against a backdrop of mass prior-holder exit suggests they inherited a largely abandoned token. This token is essentially inactive and indefensible as a trade.
Exact Solana mint: tSEakxwRz3Y3BpjDttokygCgScgLnui19NJGrR4pump. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.
Lucifer Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: Hellcat received an Overall Health Score of 22 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: Hellcat received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.
What changed between saved analyses?
No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.
Lucifer Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- 24-hour volume is $3.36 with zero buys and only 2 sells recorded; the token has had no buyer participation in at least 24 hours, making any position effectively illiquid in practice despite the pool existing.
- Whale-sized wallets (>1% of supply) accounted for 81.5% of all sell volume over the full observable window (~13.5 days), with 6 such sellers all fully exited — this is a pattern of large early holders distributing entirely and departing.
- At ~$3,677 market cap with $4,344 in the pool, the pool holds more value than the entire circulating float — this reflects 82.7% of supply sitting in the LP, meaning almost no tokens are in active circulation and any real trade would have severe price impact.
Lucifer Risk and Health Signals
- Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
- Both mint and freeze authorities are inactive with no dangerous token extensions present, eliminating the risk of supply manipulation or wallet freezing by any party.
- The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-09-10 16:58 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure.
- Observed wallet activity does not establish the wallet holder's motives or conviction.
Lucifer Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 11.20% of supply.
Is Lucifer Safe?
- Creator risk check: prior blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
Lucifer Trade Setup, Entry Levels, Targets and Invalidation
Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 4 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.00000376283777232359; nearest resistance: 0.000003855564434623995; Levels derived from 670 1h candles (~30.1 days) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice.
Lucifer Risk Analysis Questions
Which Solana token does this Lucifer report analyse?
Hellcat (Lucifer) is identified by Solana mint tSEakxwRz3Y3BpjDttokygCgScgLnui19NJGrR4pump; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.
What is the AI health score for Hellcat (Lucifer)?
The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 22/100 for Lucifer, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.
What is the automated rug risk level for Hellcat (Lucifer)?
The on-chain checks rated rug risk for Lucifer as 'Extreme'.
What is the entry assessment for Hellcat (Lucifer)?
The entry assessment for Lucifer is avoid.
How much liquidity does Hellcat (Lucifer) have?
The liquidity recorded in the saved analysis for Lucifer was $4,344.
Are the mint and freeze authorities active for Hellcat (Lucifer)?
At the saved check for Lucifer, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.
What is the top-10 holder concentration for Hellcat (Lucifer)?
At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 11.20% of the total supply of Lucifer.
Was a sell route found for Hellcat (Lucifer) in the saved analysis?
A sell route was observed for Lucifer.
When was the AI analysis for Hellcat (Lucifer) last updated?
The on-chain analysis for Lucifer was last updated on 10/09/2026, 16:58:23 GMT.