LOOM Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

LOOM Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: loom has an Overall Health Score of 36 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: loom has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

LOOM Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• One top-10 whale (rank 6, ~2.47% of supply) has sold over 10.4M tokens within its first ~9 hours of holding, and remains a top seller across every observed time window. This pattern — buying large, immediately distributing — is characteristic of fast-flip or coordinated dump activity.
• Over the full ~44-hour observed window, sell volume (~72M tokens) exceeded buy volume (~32.5M tokens) by more than 2:1, with whale-tier sellers accounting for over 51% of gross sell volume. The imbalance persists across 1H, 12H, and 24H sub-windows.
• Most trackable whale entries were made within the last 24 hours (average whale holding duration: ~1.9 days), and the one confirmed distributing whale held for under half a day before selling began. This suggests positional churn rather than conviction holding, raising the risk of cascading exits.

LOOM Risk and Health Signals

• Both mint and freeze authorities are confirmed inactive with null addresses, eliminating the risk of supply dilution or account freezing by a developer. This is the strongest structural positive in the dataset.
• Over 24 hours, buy transactions (171) outnumbered sell transactions (110) by roughly 1.55:1, and the 6-hour window shows 238 buys vs 87 sells. This suggests a broader pool of small buyers is active, even as large holders distribute.
• At ~$149K DEX liquidity against an ~$810K market cap (~18.4% ratio), the pool is deep enough to absorb typical retail exit sizes without catastrophic slippage, though large whale exits would move price materially.

LOOM Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 22.5% of supply.

Is LOOM Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

LOOM Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 4 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.0007380168681543482; nearest resistance: 0.0009213588303371144; Levels derived from 561 1h candles (~47.1 days) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

LOOM Price and Market Data

Assessment: LOOM ([redacted wallet]) is a 47-day-old Solana memecoin trading at a ~$810K market cap with $149K DEX liquidity (~18.4% of market cap) and $129K in 24-hour volume — adequate depth for an asset of this size but not exceptional. Mint and freeze authorities are both revoked, removing the most acute structural controls. The holder base is moderately concentrated: the top 10 non-pool wallets hold ~22.5% of supply and the top 20 hold ~33.7%, spread across 3,438 wallets, with no single non-pool holder above 3%. The critical structural concern is active sell pressure from large, very recently acquired positions: whale [redacted wallet] (rank 6, ~2.47% of supply) has been distributing steadily, having sold over 10.4M tokens (roughly 30% of its peak position) within its first 0.4 days of holding, while two other large sellers ([redacted wallet] and 5KXD…XWJ) together account for over 37% of aggregate sell volume over the past 44 hours. Net whale flow is marginally positive only because two accumulators (8GMu…xbF, EdZG…koF) arrived in the last 12 hours with fresh positions of unknown sustainability. Overall sell volume has outpaced buy volume by roughly 2.2:1 across the full observed window, decentralisation is worsening, and the only support level in the dataset is a projected (untested) zone ~9% below current price, leaving the token technically exposed on the downside.

Reason: Active, heavy distribution from a top-10 whale that held for under half a day dominates the structural picture and, combined with 2:1 sell-volume dominance across all observed windows and worsening decentralisation, makes the risk profile unfavourable for standard participation.

Report limitations

• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.