Server-rendered summary

moin Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Exact Solana mint: 8DXqVUopcdviLvujTcpwEqkKzB43Arp6E1axzsEE5Btq

moin Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: meme + coin = has an Overall Health Score of 32 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: meme + coin = has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

moin Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • Three wallets ([redacted wallet], [redacted wallet], GYSsNC…PpB) are connected by direct token transfers and together hold ~7.4% of supply. The largest, [redacted wallet], shed ~5.3M tokens in the past 24h and is classified as actively distributing.
  • The token has lost approximately 85% of its value in 24 hours, indicating a market structure that broke down at launch peaks; current price of ~$0.000185 is well below all historical resistance levels computed from the 26-hour chart.
  • In the observed ~2-hour sell window, 'big' wallets (0.1–1% of supply) drove ~58% of total sell volume across just 37 sellers, and two whale-sized sellers (>1%) added another ~19% — concentrated selling from above-average-sized holders dominates flow.

moin Risk and Health Signals

  • Both mint and freeze authorities are null and inactive, eliminating the risk of supply inflation or account freezing — a meaningful structural clean bill for a token this young.
  • Eight of the ten tracked whales show positive token balance changes over the last 24 hours, and net whale flow is strongly positive (~30.8M tokens); however, all whale holding periods average under 4 hours, limiting the durability signal.
  • With $2.78M in 24-hour DEX volume against a ~$180K market cap, the token is seeing extremely active trading; this confirms liquidity is functional and the market is live, though much of that volume occurred at higher prices.

moin Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 18.3% of supply.

Is moin Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
  • Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

moin Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 3 resistance areas were identified from 15m market candles; nearest support: 0.00017759999999999998; nearest resistance: 0.00029657608969548455; Levels derived from 106 15m candles (~26 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice. Chart history could not yet support tested swing levels. The token is only about 1.1 days old. These lower-confidence planning levels are projected mechanically from the observed market price and must be rechecked as price history develops..

moin Price and Market Data

Assessment: moin ([redacted wallet]) is just over 1 day old — launched on PumpSwap on 27 Sep 2026 — so no track record exists and every structural reading carries low durability confidence. The token has shed 85% of its price in 24 hours, leaving market cap at ~$180K against $46K in DEX liquidity (~25.5% ratio), which is workable for its micro-cap size but thin for the volume throughput it has seen. Mint and freeze authorities are both inactive, removing two key rug vectors. However, a three-wallet cluster ([redacted wallet], [redacted wallet], GYSsNC…PpB) linked by direct token transfers controls a combined ~7.4% of supply, with DU335C actively distributing (down ~5.3M tokens in 24h); this is the most structurally concerning signal present. The broader whale cohort is net accumulating — 8 of 10 tracked whales added tokens in the past 24h — but all whale holding periods are measured in hours, not days, so "accumulating" reflects very recent positioning rather than durable conviction. Active sell pressure is heavy, with "big" wallets (0.1–1% holders) responsible for ~58% of sell volume in the ~2-hour window, and net sell flow of ~$33M in tokens over that period; at only 1.1 days old, this token is too young to judge long-term durability, and the combination of an 85% drawdown, active cluster distribution, and very thin price history makes participation high risk.

Reason: An active linked-wallet cluster is distributing into an 85%-down, 1-day-old token with no tested support and concentrated big-wallet sell pressure dominating recent flow — structural risk clearly outweighs the surface-level whale accumulation signal.

Report limitations

  • This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
  • It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.

Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.

Analyzed: