MemeAssist

META Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: Meta saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: Meta received an Overall Health Score of 14 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Meta received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: 2zuGTvPPN7cMZ8Gcebci1E6Mz3Rw6FnMxByBMCbF5Qrp

Stale: analysed 69 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

One wallet controls 80% of the supply

Health Score
14/100
Rug risk
75/100 · Extreme

One wallet controls 80% of the supply. Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing. A valid measured setup is not established.

  • Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing.
  • One wallet controls 80% of the supply
  • A valid measured setup is not established.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: META (2zuG…Qrp) is an extremely fresh token — under 2 hours old — with a catastrophically concentrated holder structure: a single wallet (unlabelled wallet) holds 80% of supply and is linked via direct on-chain token transfers to two other large wallets (8cPS…UHJ and F2zQ…m71), giving the cluster combined control of ~89.7% of supply. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive, which removes one structural risk, but all three cluster wallets entered within the token's first minutes and one (F2zQ…m71) is already distributing. Market cap, FDV, liquidity depth, and price change data are entirely missing, making exit feasibility completely unknowable. The token is far too young to assess durability, and the insider cluster controlling nearly 90% of supply represents a near-critical rug risk regardless of any positive surface signals.

Exact Solana mint: 2zuGTvPPN7cMZ8Gcebci1E6Mz3Rw6FnMxByBMCbF5Qrp. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

META Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Meta received an Overall Health Score of 14 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Meta received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

META Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • Wallets unlabelled wallet (80%), 8cPS…UHJ (5.98%), and F2zQ…m71 (3.74%) are linked by direct token transfers and entered within the token's first minutes; combined they hold ~89.7% of all supply. Any suspected coordinated sell from this cluster would be instantly catastrophic for remaining holders. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only.
  • F2zQ…m71, the third-largest cluster wallet (~3.74% of supply), is already flagged as 'distributing' after holding for under 20 minutes. This is an early slow-rug signal from within the suspected coordinated group. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only.
  • Zero liquidity depth, market cap, and FDV data are available, making it impossible to assess whether any meaningful exit exists for buyers. With 80% of supply in one wallet and no observable pool size, exit feasibility for other holders is effectively unknown.

META Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Both mintAuthorityActive and freezeAuthorityActive are false with null authority addresses, meaning the supply cannot be inflated and wallets cannot be frozen at the contract level — one genuine structural positive.
  • activeDangerousExtensions and dormantExtensionWarnings are both empty, removing an additional layer of contract-level risk that is common in predatory token launches.
  • In the ~14-minute window captured, buy volume (~50.2B tokens) vastly exceeds sell volume (~215K tokens), but this reflects a launch frenzy among 982 unique buyers and carries no predictive weight given the cluster control above.

META Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 97.67% of supply.

Is META Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: inconclusive.

META Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this META report analyse?

Meta (META) is identified by Solana mint 2zuGTvPPN7cMZ8Gcebci1E6Mz3Rw6FnMxByBMCbF5Qrp; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for Meta (META)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 14/100 for META, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for Meta (META)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for META as 'Extreme'.

What is the entry assessment for Meta (META)?

The entry assessment for META is avoid.

How much liquidity does Meta (META) have?

Liquidity for META was not established in this saved analysis.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for Meta (META)?

At the saved check for META, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for Meta (META)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 97.67% of the total supply of META.

Was a sell route found for Meta (META) in the saved analysis?

Sell-route availability for META was not established in the saved analysis.

When was the AI analysis for Meta (META) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for META was last updated on 27/08/2026, 23:46:24 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings