Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.
Historical analysis snapshot.
At a glance: MetaDAO (META) is an extremely fresh token, launched less than 4 hours ago on Meteora, with essentially no tradable history, zero 24-hour volume, null market cap and null liquidity data. A single wallet (9rap…sVU / owner FhVo…LuM) controls 80% of total supply, and the top 4 wallets collectively hold ~97% — extreme and structurally dangerous concentration regardless of category. A linked wallet cluster (AYK4…FaS ↔ CkJ4…nVD, combined ~6.8%) was identified via direct token transfers, adding insider-coordination risk on top of the dominant-whale position. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive, which removes those specific vectors, but the near-total supply concentration in unidentified wallets with zero holding history makes this token indefensible for any risk-managed entry. It is far too young to assess durability, and every positive signal (net whale inflow, zero sells) is trivially explained by the token being only ~4 hours old with a single buyer ecosystem.
Exact Solana mint: 3dWmgLQgpLN9xNJyASs4Mdvp4HttiTyZnJrJbCfyLQUu. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.
META Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: MetaDAO received an Overall Health Score of 12 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: MetaDAO received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.
What changed between saved analyses?
No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.
META Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- Wallet FhVo…LuM holds 80.0% of total supply via account 9rap…sVU and has zero recorded activity changes in 1d/7d/30d windows — this position can be dumped at any time with no warning. At 80% a single sell decision can drive price to near-zero regardless of any other buyer activity.
- Even excluding the dominant whale, wallets AMG5…QJK (10.2%), AYK4…FaS (5.3%) and CkJ4…nVD (1.4%) together control another ~17% — the effective free float for the remaining 2,067 holders is under 3% of supply.
- AYK4…FaS and CkJ4…nVD are linked by direct on-chain token transfers and together hold ~6.8% of supply; suspected coordinated action between these wallets would amplify selling pressure beyond what individual holder rankings imply. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only.
META Risk and Health Signals
- Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
- Neither mintAuthorityActive nor freezeAuthorityActive is set, meaning the team cannot silently inflate supply or freeze holder wallets — these two control vectors are closed.
- tokenControls reports zero active dangerous extensions and zero dormant extension warnings, removing a further category of structural exploit risk.
- 2,992 buy transactions and 0 sell transactions were recorded, but the window covers only ~16 minutes of a 4-hour-old token — this is launch noise, not a bullish structure signal.
META Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 97.93% of supply.
Is META Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: a possible match was detected.
- Sellability check: inconclusive.
META Risk Analysis Questions
Which Solana token does this META report analyse?
MetaDAO (META) is identified by Solana mint 3dWmgLQgpLN9xNJyASs4Mdvp4HttiTyZnJrJbCfyLQUu; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.
What is the AI health score for MetaDAO (META)?
The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 12/100 for META, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.
What is the automated rug risk level for MetaDAO (META)?
The on-chain checks rated rug risk for META as 'Extreme'.
What is the entry assessment for MetaDAO (META)?
The entry assessment for META is avoid.
How much liquidity does MetaDAO (META) have?
Liquidity for META was not established in this saved analysis.
Are the mint and freeze authorities active for MetaDAO (META)?
At the saved check for META, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.
What is the top-10 holder concentration for MetaDAO (META)?
At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 97.93% of the total supply of META.
Was a sell route found for MetaDAO (META) in the saved analysis?
Sell-route availability for META was not established in the saved analysis.
When was the AI analysis for MetaDAO (META) last updated?
The on-chain analysis for META was last updated on 29/08/2026, 20:46:15 GMT.