MemeAssist

MetaDAO (META) Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: MetaDAO saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: MetaDAO received an Overall Health Score of 12 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: MetaDAO received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: 7BKv5TSnvY2hyRa778S5Sko1XWHsUu3XensWqsjz1gv4

Stale: analysed 67 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

One wallet controls 80% of the supply

Health Score
12/100
Rug risk
75/100 · Extreme

One wallet controls 80% of the supply. Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing. A valid measured setup is not established.

  • Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing.
  • One wallet controls 80% of the supply
  • A valid measured setup is not established.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: MetaDAO (META) is an extremely fresh token — less than 12 hours old — with zero market cap data, zero 24-hour volume, and no measurable liquidity reported. Two wallets (FhVo3…LuM at 80.0% and HGRh…3wz at 18.7%) together hold 98.7% of total supply, creating catastrophic concentration risk with no sign of any meaningful distribution. Mint and freeze authorities are both inactive, which removes one structural threat, but the absence of any key-level, price-change, or liquidity data makes the overall picture almost completely opaque. The token is far too young and data-sparse to form any durable judgement; the dominant structural risk is that two unidentified wallets control virtually the entire supply and could exit at any moment into what appears to be a near-zero liquidity environment.

Exact Solana mint: 7BKv5TSnvY2hyRa778S5Sko1XWHsUu3XensWqsjz1gv4. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

META Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: MetaDAO received an Overall Health Score of 12 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: MetaDAO received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

META Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • FhVo3…LuM holds 80.0% and HGRh…3wz holds 18.7% of total supply — combined 98.7% — with no labelling, no holding-period history, and no evidence of distribution. Any sell decision by either wallet would be existential for remaining holders.
  • Reported liquidity, market cap, and FDV are all null; 24-hour volume is $0. There is no observable exit route of any depth, making participation indefensible until real liquidity can be confirmed.
  • The pair was created less than 0.46 days ago; there is no price history, no holder retention evidence, and no durable signal of any kind. All structural risks must be weighted maximally at this stage.

META Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Neither mint nor freeze authority is active, meaning the supply cannot be inflated and holder balances cannot be frozen by the creator. This is one positive structural feature in an otherwise critical setup.
  • The cluster analysis returned empty, so there is no direct on-chain evidence of suspected coordinated insider wallets beyond the two dominant holders — though absence of cluster data does not confirm the wallets are unrelated. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only.
  • 2,976 buy trades versus 4 sell trades in ~3.7 hours, but the token's price is $2.3e-15 and volume is negligible; this ratio reflects a near-empty market, not genuine demand strength.

META Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 99.36% of supply.

Is META Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: inconclusive.

META Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this META report analyse?

MetaDAO (META) is identified by Solana mint 7BKv5TSnvY2hyRa778S5Sko1XWHsUu3XensWqsjz1gv4; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for MetaDAO (META)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 12/100 for META, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for MetaDAO (META)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for META as 'Extreme'.

What is the entry assessment for MetaDAO (META)?

The entry assessment for META is avoid.

How much liquidity does MetaDAO (META) have?

Liquidity for META was not established in this saved analysis.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for MetaDAO (META)?

At the saved check for META, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for MetaDAO (META)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 99.36% of the total supply of META.

Was a sell route found for MetaDAO (META) in the saved analysis?

Sell-route availability for META was not established in the saved analysis.

When was the AI analysis for MetaDAO (META) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for META was last updated on 29/08/2026, 10:07:21 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings