MemeAssist

MetaMask Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: MetaMask saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: MetaMask received an Overall Health Score of 10 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: MetaMask received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: 2bYZMTje2oxDaWUrG4mesM7QQmttGPLFcYDsN1JYwPyp

Stale: analysed 66 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

One wallet controls 80% of the supply

Health Score
10/100
Rug risk
75/100 · Extreme

One wallet controls 80% of the supply. Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing. A valid measured setup is not established.

  • Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing.
  • One wallet controls 80% of the supply
  • A valid measured setup is not established.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: MetaMask (unlabelled wallet) is a Solana token that is approximately 2 hours old, making any structural assessment highly preliminary. A single wallet (FhVo…LuM) holds 80% of total supply and is directly linked via on-chain token transfers to two other large holders (bAoJ…ZG and 7aVp…Uis), forming a cluster that collectively controls ~90% of supply — a classic insider concentration pattern. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive, which is a minor positive, but liquidity data is entirely null and the token has generated zero 24-hour volume, making exit feasibility completely unknown. The decentralisation trend is flagged as worsening, all whales have held for under a day, and no whale has a never-sold record; the token is far too young to judge durability, and the on-chain cluster structure represents an extreme and unresolved exit-scam risk.

Exact Solana mint: 2bYZMTje2oxDaWUrG4mesM7QQmttGPLFcYDsN1JYwPyp. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

MetaMask Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: MetaMask received an Overall Health Score of 10 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: MetaMask received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

MetaMask Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • Wallets FhVo…LuM (80%), bAoJ…ZG (6.15%), and 7aVp…Uis (3.8%) are directly linked by on-chain token transfers and together hold ~90% of total supply. This is a textbook suspected coordinated insider structure with catastrophic exit-scam potential. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only.
  • All liquidity fields are null and 24-hour volume is $0. There is no observable market depth, meaning even a trivial insider sell could be unabsorbable and retail exit could be impossible.
  • At ~0.09 days old, there is no durability evidence whatsoever. Every structural risk (cluster, concentration, unknown liquidity) is unresolved and carries maximum weight at this age.

MetaMask Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Both mintAuthorityActive and freezeAuthorityActive are false with null authority addresses. This removes the risk of unlimited token issuance or wallet freezing by the deployer.
  • The tokenControls data shows no active dangerous extensions and no dormant extension warnings, which is a baseline structural positive.
  • The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-08-30 00:58 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. However, the dev address resolves to the system program (unlabelled wallet), suggesting the real deployer wallet is not identified — treat this as a data gap, not a clean bill of health.

MetaMask Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 97.56% of supply.

Is MetaMask Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: inconclusive.

MetaMask Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this MetaMask report analyse?

MetaMask (MetaMask) is identified by Solana mint 2bYZMTje2oxDaWUrG4mesM7QQmttGPLFcYDsN1JYwPyp; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for MetaMask (MetaMask)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 10/100 for MetaMask, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for MetaMask (MetaMask)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for MetaMask as 'Extreme'.

What is the entry assessment for MetaMask (MetaMask)?

The entry assessment for MetaMask is avoid.

How much liquidity does MetaMask (MetaMask) have?

Liquidity for MetaMask was not established in this saved analysis.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for MetaMask (MetaMask)?

At the saved check for MetaMask, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for MetaMask (MetaMask)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 97.56% of the total supply of MetaMask.

Was a sell route found for MetaMask (MetaMask) in the saved analysis?

Sell-route availability for MetaMask was not established in the saved analysis.

When was the AI analysis for MetaMask (MetaMask) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for MetaMask was last updated on 30/08/2026, 00:58:47 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings