Server-rendered summary

Sparky Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.

Historical analysis snapshot. This report is more than six hours old. This snapshot is not a current buy or sell signal. Trade decisions, prices, levels and sellability may have changed. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.

Exact Solana mint: 3vSD9xyKCfRBpP3uDEUJaPyWGNWZDFkv4C4qHbjLpump

Sparky Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Official Tesla Dog has an Overall Health Score of 30 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Official Tesla Dog has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Sparky Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • All 10 tracked whale wallets entered within the last 1.1 days (average 0.89 days), none have demonstrated any conviction through price adversity, and 0% have a 'neverSold' confirmed true. This cohort represents speculative positioning, not a durable holder base.
  • Over the 24h window, 'big' (0.1–1%) and 'whale' (>1%) buckets account for ~83% of total sell volume (≈$267M in token units out of $323M total). FRfC…56u sold ~45.8M tokens (~13.8% of sell volume) in under 24 hours having held only 0.076 days.
  • The on-chain decentralisation trend is explicitly flagged as 'worsening'; the top 20 non-pool wallets control ~35% of supply, with 17 wallets each holding >1%, creating severe exit-path crowding for any single large holder.

Sparky Risk and Health Signals

  • The identified dev wallet ([redacted wallet]) shows zero sells across 1d, 7d, and 30d windows, removing the most acute insider distribution risk from the equation.
  • Both mint and freeze authorities are null and inactive, eliminating supply dilution and asset-freeze risks at the token-control level.
  • On a net-flow basis, 9 whales are classified as accumulating with a net 7d inflow of ~188M tokens; however, this must be discounted heavily given all positions are less than 1.1 days old and have not been tested by adversity.

Sparky Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 24.8% of supply.

Is Sparky Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
  • Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

Sparky Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 3 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.00009537730460678544; nearest resistance: 0.00014898959276936873; Levels derived from 56 1h candles (~51.4 days) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

Sparky Price and Market Data

Assessment: Official Tesla Dog (Sparky) is a 103-day-old micro-cap (~$147K market cap) that suffered an 80% 24-hour drawdown and now trades at $0.0001466, marginally above the prior analysis's $0.0001245 level, with the entire observable whale cohort having entered within the last 1–2 days (average holding duration ~0.89 days) — these are speculative late-entrants, not seasoned holders, and the decentralisation trend is explicitly worsening. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive and the dev wallet shows zero selling activity across all windows, which removes the most direct structural control risks. The 17 whale wallets collectively hold ~33% of supply, all entered in the last 1–2 days with no meaningful holding track record, and sell-side pressure is dominated by large and whale-sized wallets (82% of sell volume in the 24h window came from 'big' and 'whale' buckets), indicating that the heavy sellers are not retail capitulation but concentrated position exits. Liquidity at $43.8K against a $147K market cap (~30% ratio) is relatively deep for this size but thin in absolute terms; a coordinated exit from even one whale-sized wallet would move price violently. The health score trajectory (28 → 31 → current) shows a token that has been structurally weak since first observed with no demonstrated durability, and the current data does not justify a meaningful upgrade.

Reason: The entire whale cohort entered within the last 24 hours with no holding track record, large/whale wallets are generating 83% of sell volume, decentralisation is worsening, and the token has shown no structural durability across three consecutive weekly analyses — the structure is speculative and fr

Report limitations

  • This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
  • It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.

Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.

Analyzed: