OPENAI Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

OPENAI Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: OpenAI PreStocks has an Overall Health Score of 10 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: OpenAI PreStocks has an extreme Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Trade Check: OpenAI PreStocks saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: unavailable. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.

OPENAI Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• Wallet uBTX…4QJ (owner 8J1b…GDL) holds 92.51% of total supply and added ~2.03 billion tokens in the past 24 hours alone. If this wallet begins distributing, there is no realistic buy-side depth to absorb the sell pressure at any meaningful price.
• Liquidity is reported as $0 against a ~$852K market cap — there is no confirmed DEX pool depth to exit into. Any apparent trading volume may be occurring in conditions where large sell orders would collapse the price entirely.
• Holders ranked 2–17 each hold almost exactly 0.47% of supply (~460–479M tokens), a statistically unlikely uniform distribution that is a strong signal of pre-arranged multi-wallet supply staging. This cluster controls ~7.5% of supply and could coordinate a coordinated exit.

OPENAI Risk and Health Signals

• Neither mint nor freeze authority is active, and no dangerous token control extensions are present, eliminating the specific risks of post-launch supply inflation or wallet freezing.
• 24h data shows 24,957 buys vs 19,904 sells by transaction count, indicating more individual buy actions than sells — though this is partially a function of the token's viral name attracting retail speculation rather than evidence of structural demand.
• The token has appreciated 265% in 24 hours, attracting significant speculative attention, but this must be viewed in the context of zero liquidity depth and extreme insider concentration — momentum in this structure reflects manipulation risk, not organic strength.

OPENAI Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 96.8% of supply.

Is OPENAI Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: a possible match was detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

OPENAI Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 3 resistance areas were identified from 15m market candles; nearest support: 0.000006475341533964293; nearest resistance: 0.000008569801375324819; Levels derived from 86 15m candles (~21 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Price is at/near its window high with no overhead swing resistance; resistance shown is the window high plus measured-move projections. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

OPENAI Price and Market Data

Assessment: OpenAI PreStocks (OPENAI) is approximately 1.3 days old with a market cap of ~$852K and reported on-chain DEX liquidity of $0 — exit feasibility is critically impaired and the token should be treated as effectively illiquid at current market cap. Supply concentration is extreme and structurally alarming: a single wallet (uBTX…4QJ, owner 8J1b…GDL) holds 92.5% of total supply and has been actively accumulating, adding ~2.03 billion tokens in the past day, representing a worsening of an already catastrophic concentration. The 16 dolphin-tier wallets holding ~7.5% of supply between them show near-identical balances (~0.47% each), a pattern strongly suggestive of coordinated multi-wallet distribution staging rather than organic buyer accumulation. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive and no dangerous token extensions are present, but these positives are entirely overwhelmed by the dominant-wallet risk and zero reported liquidity. At less than 36 hours old with no track record, zero verified liquidity depth, and a single address controlling over 92% of supply in active accumulation, this token presents an indefensible structural risk profile.

Reason: A single unidentified wallet controlling 92.5% of supply and actively accumulating in a token with zero reported liquidity and a coordinated-looking 16-wallet dolphin cluster constitutes an indefensible structural risk regardless of short-term price action.

Report limitations

• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.