PEPENOM Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

PEPENOM Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: PEPE BROCK has an Overall Health Score of 55 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: PEPE BROCK has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

PEPENOM Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• No creator wallet could be identified from on-chain data.
• Two whale-tier wallets controlling a combined ~3.8% of supply share SOL funding sources, suggesting possible coordination. If these wallets act in concert, a sudden coordinated exit could generate outsized sell pressure relative to liquidity.
• The top-holder cohort is growing its share over time, not shrinking. The top 19 non-pool whales hold ~35.9% of supply, and the trend line is moving in the wrong direction for long-term health.

PEPENOM Risk and Health Signals

• Among the top 10 non-pool whales, 4 are actively accumulating and 6 are holding; none are distributing. Net 7-day whale inflow is positive (~14.4M tokens), and 60% have never sold since entering.
• With ~$130K in DEX liquidity against a ~$229K market cap (~57%), exits are feasible for typical retail position sizes without severe slippage — well above the danger threshold for a micro-cap of this age.
• Both mint and freeze authorities are null and inactive, meaning no party can inflate supply or freeze holder wallets — key structural safety boxes checked.

PEPENOM Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 24.5% of supply.

Is PEPENOM Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

PEPENOM Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 4 support areas and 4 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.00029887983380225656; nearest resistance: 0.00040677; Levels derived from 311 1h candles (~12.9 days) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice. Chart history could not yet support tested swing levels. These lower-confidence planning levels are projected mechanically from the observed market price and must be rechecked as price history develops..

PEPENOM Price and Market Data

Assessment: PEPENOM (PEPE BROCK) is a 13-day-old PumpSwap memecoin with a $229K market cap and $130K in DEX liquidity — a respectable ~57% liquidity-to-market-cap ratio that supports meaningful exit feasibility at this size. Mint and freeze authorities are both inactive, removing the most acute structural control risks. Whale behaviour is constructive: 4 of the top 10 non-pool whales are actively accumulating, 6 are holding, and zero are distributing; 60% have never sold, with several wallets holding since near launch (~13 days). However, a flagged cluster links two whale wallets ([redacted wallet] and [redacted wallet], combined ~3.8% of supply) via shared SOL funding sources — this is a lead, not confirmed insider activity, but raises coordination risk in a young token. Supply concentration is notable: the top 20 non-pool holders control ~36% of supply, and the decentralisation trend is described as worsening, meaning existing holders are growing their share relative to the broader base. Sell pressure over the past ~20 hours shows a mild net negative flow (-$3.2M tokens sold vs. bought), driven mostly by mid-tier wallets and one large seller ([redacted wallet] who sold ~18.8% of sell volume but has near-zero remaining balance, suggesting position exit rather than insider drip); no dev wallet has been identified, which limits insider risk assessment but also means creator exposure cannot be ruled out. At ~$49K in 24h volume, the token is above the thin-volume danger zone but not yet at the sustained levels associated with durable trend entries; the buy/sell transaction ratio remains solidly bullish at roughly 3:1 across all windows.

Reason: Whale structure is constructive and liquidity is adequate, but the unknown dev identity, worsening concentration trend, a flagged insider-linked cluster, and mild net sell volume pressure produce genuinely mixed signals that warrant monitoring before committing capital.

Report limitations

• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.