Server-rendered summary

phubber Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Exact Solana mint: CBcjQNdtgb4SHwKDqKFxD3yPSk7pEMpKHQiMmZrgpump

phubber Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: phubber has an Overall Health Score of 44 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: phubber has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

Trade Check: phubber Trade Check decision: wait. Token safety: caution. Trade Setup quality: weak. Condition to watch: Require verified historical price coverage and reassess the market structure.

Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: weak. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.

phubber Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • The token is less than 24 hours old (≈0.95 days), meaning all structural readings — holder stickiness, whale behaviour, and price levels — are provisional snapshots with no durability evidence. Any positive signal could reverse within hours.
  • In the most recent ~23-minute window, sell volume exceeded buy volume by ~1.67×; one whale-sized seller (>1% of supply) accounted for ~26.7% of total sell volume and fully exited, and 7 'big' sellers (0.1–1% each) drove another ~52.6% — this is concentrated, not retail, selling pressure.
  • No creator wallet has been identified, so insider allocation, bundled launch buys, and dev selling cannot be tracked or ruled out. This is a transparency gap, not confirmed danger, but it removes a key safety signal.

phubber Risk and Health Signals

  • Both mint and freeze authorities are null and inactive, removing the most common structural rug vectors — the supply cannot be inflated and wallets cannot be frozen by a controller.
  • Of the 10 top non-pool whales, 6 are classified as accumulating with positive 1-day net flows, and none are distributing; net whale flow over 24 hours is strongly positive in token terms.
  • 24-hour volume of ~$8.57M against a ~$394K market cap represents a volume-to-market-cap ratio exceeding 21×, indicating intense speculative activity and genuine market interest, though this cuts both ways.

phubber Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 18.5% of supply.

Is phubber Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
  • Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

phubber Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 3 support areas and 4 resistance areas were identified from 15m market candles; nearest support: 0.0003599848448635578; nearest resistance: 0.0004199701001721848; Levels derived from 91 15m candles (~23 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice..

phubber Price and Market Data

Assessment: phubber ([redacted wallet]) is a sub-24-hour-old PumpSwap token with ~$394K market cap, 3,634 holders, and no active mint or freeze authority — clean structural controls. Historical price damage is unavailable due to insufficient chart history, so no long-term collapse can be confirmed or ruled out; the token is simply too young to judge durability. Whale concentration is notable: 12 wallets each hold >1% of supply, collectively controlling ~20.6% of supply (excluding the LP), with 6 of the 10 tracked whales actively accumulating over the last 24 hours and none distributing. No developer wallet has been identified, which is both a gap in transparency and the absence of a confirmed insider sell threat. The most pressing near-term concern is the recent sell-pressure snapshot: over roughly the last 23 minutes of the observed window, sell volume (~$43.6M token units) exceeded buy volume (~$26.1M units) by more than 1.5×, with 74.6% of that sell volume attributed to wallets aged under 2 days — consistent with early flippers exiting rather than organised insider distribution. Liquidity at ~$70K against a ~$394K market cap is thin but not indefensible for a DEX-native token less than one day old; however, a concentrated holder base plus thin liquidity means exit feasibility for large positions is limited. The decentralisation trend is flagged as worsening, and average holding age across whales is under 7 hours, so no sticky base has yet been demonstrated. This token is too young for a durable health verdict; treat all readings as provisional.

Reason: A sub-24-hour token with no verified creator, thin liquidity, a worsening concentration trend, and recent heavy sell pressure from large wallets makes this viable only for participants explicitly accepting outsized structural uncertainty.

Report limitations

  • Historical price-risk coverage is unavailable.
  • This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
  • It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.

Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.

Analyzed: