Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.
Historical analysis snapshot.
At a glance: PONS is an extremely fresh token launched less than 9 hours ago on Meteora with only 86 holders, zero 24-hour volume, and all market cap and liquidity data missing — making any structural assessment highly speculative. Supply concentration is catastrophic: a single unlabelled wallet (unlabelled wallet) holds 80% of total supply, and the second-largest (DcuNX…5Ho) holds a further 14.6%, meaning two wallets control nearly 95% of all tokens. The second whale accumulated over 5.7 billion tokens in the last day alone, suggesting suspected coordinated or insider-linked positioning at launch. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive, which is the only clear structural positive. With no liquidity, price, market cap, or volume data available, and no track record whatsoever, this token cannot be evaluated as anything other than a critical-risk launch.
Exact Solana mint: 2EnbmtrSjC1W4zjPQSibo4DDSUftRK7J7Yd9Y1RTg6gb. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.
PONS Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: Pons received an Overall Health Score of 8 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: Pons received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.
What changed between saved analyses?
No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.
PONS Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- Wallet unlabelled wallet holds 80% and DcuNX…5Ho holds 14.6% of total supply; together they can unilaterally dump the entire float. There are no pool identifications to reframe either position, making this the single most dangerous structural feature of this token.
- The second whale (9qy7H…NPT) accumulated 5.75 billion tokens in the same sub-24-hour window the token launched, with a holding period of under 5 hours. This timing is consistent with a launch-buying group or suspected coordinated buy at launch rather than organic accumulation. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only.
- liquidityUsd, marketCapUsd, fdvUsd, and all price change metrics are null; there is no way to assess exit feasibility, depth, or whether the pool contains enough liquidity to absorb any meaningful sell order.
PONS Risk and Health Signals
- Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
- Neither mint nor freeze authority is active, meaning supply cannot be inflated and wallets cannot be frozen — these controls are clean, which is the minimum baseline expectation for any token.
- activeDangerousExtensions is empty and no dormant extension warnings are present, removing one layer of programmatic rug risk.
- 9qy7H…NPT added 5.75 billion tokens (+64.6% of its current balance) within hours of launch; at this concentration level, accumulation by an unidentified wallet is a coordination signal, not a bullish one.
PONS Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 97.29% of supply.
Is PONS Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: a possible match was detected.
- Sellability check: inconclusive.
PONS Risk Analysis Questions
Which Solana token does this PONS report analyse?
Pons (PONS) is identified by Solana mint 2EnbmtrSjC1W4zjPQSibo4DDSUftRK7J7Yd9Y1RTg6gb; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.
What is the AI health score for Pons (PONS)?
The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 8/100 for PONS, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.
What is the automated rug risk level for Pons (PONS)?
The on-chain checks rated rug risk for PONS as 'Extreme'.
What is the entry assessment for Pons (PONS)?
The entry assessment for PONS is avoid.
How much liquidity does Pons (PONS) have?
Liquidity for PONS was not established in this saved analysis.
Are the mint and freeze authorities active for Pons (PONS)?
At the saved check for PONS, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.
What is the top-10 holder concentration for Pons (PONS)?
At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 97.29% of the total supply of PONS.
Was a sell route found for Pons (PONS) in the saved analysis?
Sell-route availability for PONS was not established in the saved analysis.
When was the AI analysis for Pons (PONS) last updated?
The on-chain analysis for PONS was last updated on 28/08/2026, 09:56:32 GMT.