Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.
Historical analysis snapshot.
At a glance: PONS is a less-than-one-day-old PumpSwap token whose market cap has collapsed to approximately $1,772 — a near-total destruction of value driven by a single wallet (unlabelled wallet) that dumped ~$3.79M in sell volume, representing 98.9% of all sell pressure over the token's lifetime. That wallet has fully exited, but the damage is done: price is down 95.7% in 24 hours, only 15 holders remain, and there has been zero buy or sell activity in the last hour, suggesting the market has effectively frozen. On the structural side, mint and freeze authorities are inactive, no wallet clusters are detected, and the dev wallet shows no selling activity — but these positives are overwhelmed by the post-collapse reality. The token is far too young and the price structure too destroyed to assess any long-term durability; this is a post-dump shell with negligible absolute liquidity and no observable path to recovery.
Exact Solana mint: 8pTYkoQSaQH6DfX5sgxWJ7AQtNUGu9sULYARydkRpump. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.
PONS Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: Pons received an Overall Health Score of 14 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: Pons received a Low Rug Risk Rating.
What changed between saved analyses?
No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.
PONS Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- One wallet (unlabelled wallet) executed ~$3.79M in sells representing 98.9% of all sell volume, driving a -95.7% price collapse within the token's first ~23 hours. This wallet has now fully exited, but the structural damage to price and holder confidence is permanent at this scale.
- There have been zero buys and zero sells in the last hour, and zero activity in the 6-hour window, indicating the market has frozen post-dump. With only 15 remaining holders and a $1,772 market cap, there is no observable price discovery or liquidity demand.
- Liquidity of ~$1,794 against a $1,772 market cap means the pool is technically solvent but practically unusable at any meaningful size — even a small trade would cause extreme slippage and the absolute depth is insufficient to support normal participation.
PONS Risk and Health Signals
- Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
- Both mint and freeze authorities are confirmed inactive with no dangerous token extensions, removing the risk of supply inflation or account freezing. This is a baseline structural positive, though it does not offset the market damage already done.
- The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-09-04 00:16 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. The identified dev wallet (unlabelled wallet) holds 0% of supply and has recorded zero sells across all measured windows.
- Cluster analysis across the top wallets shows no linked funding sources or suspected coordinated transfer patterns, reducing — though not eliminating — the probability of an organised insider operation among remaining holders. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only.
PONS Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 0.11% of supply.
Is PONS Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
PONS Trade Setup, Entry Levels, Targets and Invalidation
Support and resistance context: 0 support areas and 2 resistance areas were identified from 15m market candles; nearest resistance: 0.00000180671553444509; Levels derived from 93 15m candles (~23 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice.
PONS Risk Analysis Questions
Which Solana token does this PONS report analyse?
Pons (PONS) is identified by Solana mint 8pTYkoQSaQH6DfX5sgxWJ7AQtNUGu9sULYARydkRpump; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.
What is the AI health score for Pons (PONS)?
The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 14/100 for PONS, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.
What is the automated rug risk level for Pons (PONS)?
The on-chain checks rated rug risk for PONS as 'Low'.
What is the entry assessment for Pons (PONS)?
The entry assessment for PONS is avoid.
How much liquidity does Pons (PONS) have?
The liquidity recorded in the saved analysis for PONS was $1,794.
Are the mint and freeze authorities active for Pons (PONS)?
At the saved check for PONS, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.
What is the top-10 holder concentration for Pons (PONS)?
At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 0.11% of the total supply of PONS.
Was a sell route found for Pons (PONS) in the saved analysis?
A sell route was observed for PONS.
When was the AI analysis for Pons (PONS) last updated?
The on-chain analysis for PONS was last updated on 04/09/2026, 00:16:28 GMT.