Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.
Historical analysis snapshot.
At a glance: PONS is a roughly one-day-old Pumpswap micro-cap with a market cap and liquidity both sitting near $1,800 — effectively at the absolute floor of viability. The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-09-04 01:31 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. Sell volume over the tracked window overwhelms buy volume by more than 110:1 in USD terms, with multiple wallets each exiting identical ~3.82 million token positions suggesting suspected coordinated early-buyer distribution at launch. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only. Only 10 wallets hold any supply outside the pool, trading has gone completely dark (zero transactions in the last 6 hours), and 24-hour volume is just $7.95 — far below any threshold associated with durable tokens. Wallet activity does not establish the creator's intentions.
Exact Solana mint: 93Shr7mX3LHZ2CBhZYo2GijQLWZ2E4ea8V2bUNvwpump. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.
PONS Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: Pons received an Overall Health Score of 8 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: Pons received a Low Rug Risk Rating.
What changed between saved analyses?
No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.
PONS Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-09-04 01:31 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. Wallet activity does not establish the creator's intentions.
- At least five wallets each sold identical ~3.82 million token amounts and fully exited; this pattern of uniform sell sizes across multiple wallets strongly suggests launch-buying group or suspected coordinated early-buyer distribution rather than organic selling. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only.
- There have been zero buys and zero sells in the last 6 hours, and 24-hour volume is $7.95 across only 3 transactions. The token has entered functional dormancy with no observable market participation.
PONS Risk and Health Signals
- Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
- Neither mint nor freeze authority is active, meaning the supply cannot be inflated and tokens cannot be frozen. This removes two common attack vectors, though it does not offset the completed dev dump.
- The cluster analysis returned no linked wallet groups among the top holders. However, the identical exit sizes across multiple wallets remain a coordination concern that clustering data alone cannot fully resolve.
- The 10 remaining non-pool wallets show no selling activity in the last 24 hours, and five are flagged as accumulating. Given the tiny token amounts involved (median balance ~117 tokens), this holding behaviour has no material structural significance.
PONS Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 0.16% of supply.
Is PONS Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
PONS Trade Setup, Entry Levels, Targets and Invalidation
Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 0 resistance areas were identified from 1m market candles; nearest support: 0.00000178625610113166; Levels derived from 62 1m candles (~24 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice.
PONS Risk Analysis Questions
Which Solana token does this PONS report analyse?
Pons (PONS) is identified by Solana mint 93Shr7mX3LHZ2CBhZYo2GijQLWZ2E4ea8V2bUNvwpump; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.
What is the AI health score for Pons (PONS)?
The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 8/100 for PONS, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.
What is the automated rug risk level for Pons (PONS)?
The on-chain checks rated rug risk for PONS as 'Low'.
What is the entry assessment for Pons (PONS)?
An entry assessment for PONS was not established in this saved analysis.
How much liquidity does Pons (PONS) have?
The liquidity recorded in the saved analysis for PONS was $1,821.
Are the mint and freeze authorities active for Pons (PONS)?
At the saved check for PONS, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.
What is the top-10 holder concentration for Pons (PONS)?
At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 0.16% of the total supply of PONS.
Was a sell route found for Pons (PONS) in the saved analysis?
A sell route was observed for PONS.
When was the AI analysis for Pons (PONS) last updated?
The on-chain analysis for PONS was last updated on 04/09/2026, 01:31:31 GMT.