MemeAssist

PONS Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: Pons saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: Pons received an Overall Health Score of 8 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Pons received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: B6vzJ9gqhJgcxho74fQWzZDUTCvtDJr5cSehVrcoFcAy

Stale: analysed 64 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

One wallet controls 80% of the supply

Health Score
8/100
Rug risk
75/100 · Extreme

One wallet controls 80% of the supply. Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing. A valid measured setup is not established.

  • Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing.
  • One wallet controls 80% of the supply
  • A valid measured setup is not established.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: PONS is a brand-new token (less than one day old) with a market cap of effectively zero ($0.05) and no measurable liquidity on-chain. Two wallets control 97.66% of supply — the largest holds 80% and the second-largest 17.66% — making this one of the most concentrated holder structures observable. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive, which removes one structural risk, but the extreme concentration, zero volume in the last hour, zero price-change data, and absent liquidity make any entry functionally impossible and capital at extreme risk. With only 37 holders, no key price levels, and no track record whatsoever, this token cannot be assessed on durability — it is too young and too illiquid to form any confident view.

Exact Solana mint: B6vzJ9gqhJgcxho74fQWzZDUTCvtDJr5cSehVrcoFcAy. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

PONS Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Pons received an Overall Health Score of 8 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Pons received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

PONS Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • unlabelled wallet holds 80% and WDHRQd…Zp1 holds 17.66% of total supply; either wallet dumping even a fraction would crater price and trap every other holder. This level of concentration in a sub-$1 market cap token with no liquidity is a textbook exit-risk structure.
  • Reported liquidityUsd is null and 24h volume is $0; the DEX pair exists on Meteora but there is no observable depth to absorb any sell of meaningful size. Exit feasibility is effectively zero at any scale beyond dust.
  • At 0.82 days old, PONS has no price history, no holder trend, no survival evidence, and no data on whale holding periods. Every positive signal at this age must be discounted heavily.

PONS Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Neither mint nor freeze authority is active, meaning the supply cannot be inflated and wallets cannot be frozen — these two structural controls are cleanly absent, which is a baseline positive for token safety.
  • The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-09-01 09:34 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. There is no evidence of large-holder distribution so far.
  • 2,972 buy trades vs 6 sell trades over ~18.5 hours sounds positive, but total sell volume is only ~5M tokens at a price so low the dollar value is negligible; this ratio reflects launch mechanics and near-zero liquidity, not genuine demand signal.

PONS Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 98.86% of supply.

Is PONS Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: inconclusive.

PONS Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this PONS report analyse?

Pons (PONS) is identified by Solana mint B6vzJ9gqhJgcxho74fQWzZDUTCvtDJr5cSehVrcoFcAy; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for Pons (PONS)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 8/100 for PONS, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for Pons (PONS)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for PONS as 'Extreme'.

What is the entry assessment for Pons (PONS)?

The entry assessment for PONS is avoid.

How much liquidity does Pons (PONS) have?

Liquidity for PONS was not established in this saved analysis.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for Pons (PONS)?

At the saved check for PONS, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for Pons (PONS)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 98.86% of the total supply of PONS.

Was a sell route found for Pons (PONS) in the saved analysis?

Sell-route availability for PONS was not established in the saved analysis.

When was the AI analysis for Pons (PONS) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for PONS was last updated on 01/09/2026, 09:34:56 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings