MemeAssist

PONS Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: Pons saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: Pons received an Overall Health Score of 11 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Pons received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: CdwQwELS21TRtDiVq1iMQ2yhLpPtyqxFPS1QggWnpump

Stale: analysed 62 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

The identified creator matches the blacklist.

Health Score
11/100
Rug risk
85/100 · Extreme

The identified creator matches the blacklist. A valid measured setup is not established. Confirmed creator selling is present.

  • A valid measured setup is not established.
  • The identified creator matches the blacklist.
  • Confirmed creator selling is present.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: PONS is a PumpSwap-launched token less than 14 hours old with a market cap of just $1,782 — effectively at near-zero following a 95.7% price collapse from peak. The health score trajectory (28 → 14 → current) reflects a token in continuous structural deterioration since launch, not a recovery. The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-09-03 11:21 UTC. 8,027.46 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. Mint and freeze authorities are revoked and no dangerous token extensions are active, but these are the only clean structural positives in an otherwise terminal picture. With only 15 holders, a market cap below $2,000, and DEX liquidity that now exceeds market cap (liquidity: $1,808 vs. MC: $1,782), there is no meaningful price structure to trade and no defensible setup can be constructed. This token is too young and too damaged to assign any durability credit, and the sustained score decline confirms the structural collapse is real, not transient noise.

Exact Solana mint: CdwQwELS21TRtDiVq1iMQ2yhLpPtyqxFPS1QggWnpump. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

PONS Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Pons received an Overall Health Score of 11 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Pons received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

PONS Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-09-03 11:21 UTC. 8,027.46 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. This is the most direct insider exit signal observable on-chain.
  • Sell volume over the observed ~12.8-hour window is roughly 82 times buy volume in token terms, with large wallets (0.1–1% size) and whale-sized sellers (>1%) accounting for ~99.8% of all sell-side activity — this is distribution by insiders and large early holders, not retail churn.
  • At $1,782 market cap against $1,808 in DEX liquidity, the token is effectively at its floor with no meaningful price structure above; the 95.7% 24-hour drawdown has left near-zero residual value.

PONS Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Both mint and freeze authorities are inactive and set to null, and no dangerous token extensions are present — the token cannot be inflated or frozen at the contract level.
  • The 15 remaining wallet holders show no active selling and several are flagged as 'accumulating' or 'holding,' but their combined non-pool supply is less than 0.087% of total — this is structurally insignificant.
  • The health score has fallen from 28 at launch to 14 to 11 now — three consecutive deteriorating readings in under 24 hours, confirming this is a directional collapse, not noise.

PONS Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 0.09% of supply.

Is PONS Safe?

  • Creator risk check: prior blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.

PONS Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this PONS report analyse?

Pons (PONS) is identified by Solana mint CdwQwELS21TRtDiVq1iMQ2yhLpPtyqxFPS1QggWnpump; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for Pons (PONS)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 11/100 for PONS, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for Pons (PONS)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for PONS as 'Extreme'.

What is the entry assessment for Pons (PONS)?

The entry assessment for PONS is avoid.

How much liquidity does Pons (PONS) have?

The liquidity recorded in the saved analysis for PONS was $1,808.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for Pons (PONS)?

At the saved check for PONS, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for Pons (PONS)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 0.09% of the total supply of PONS.

Was a sell route found for Pons (PONS) in the saved analysis?

A sell route was observed for PONS.

When was the AI analysis for Pons (PONS) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for PONS was last updated on 03/09/2026, 11:21:44 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings