MemeAssist

PONS Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: Pons saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: Pons received an Overall Health Score of 14 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Pons received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: Dr3NePPsPbhSBSK95Mg2EPt6YPA66vQqWakvxacPUAzS

Stale: analysed 69 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

One wallet controls 80% of the supply

Health Score
14/100
Rug risk
75/100 · Extreme

One wallet controls 80% of the supply. Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing. A valid measured setup is not established.

  • Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing.
  • One wallet controls 80% of the supply
  • A valid measured setup is not established.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: PONS is an extremely fresh token — under 11 hours old — with a $0.05 market cap, null liquidity data, and zero 24-hour volume recorded, making any structural assessment highly provisional. Supply is catastrophically concentrated: the top wallet (77Zh…DmL, owner FhVo…LuM) holds 80% of supply and the second wallet (2jQu…QMf, owner 73to…E93) holds a further 16.9%, leaving the remaining 28 holders sharing just over 3% between them. Both mint and freeze authorities are inactive, which removes token-control risk, but the extreme top-2 concentration in a brand-new, effectively illiquid token is a classic exit-risk structure. The token is far too young to judge any durability, and the absence of liquidity data, price history, and key levels makes a defensible trade setup impossible.

Exact Solana mint: Dr3NePPsPbhSBSK95Mg2EPt6YPA66vQqWakvxacPUAzS. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

PONS Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Pons received an Overall Health Score of 14 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Pons received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

PONS Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • Wallet 77Zh…DmL (owner FhVo…LuM) holds 80% and 2jQu…QMf (owner 73to…E93) holds 16.9% of total supply — together nearly 97% between two unidentified, unlabelled addresses. In a token this young with no liquidity depth data, this structure is indistinguishable from a pre-rug setup.
  • liquidityUsd is null and no key levels are computable, meaning there is no observable exit route for any position of meaningful size. Combined with a $0.05 market cap, even trivial sell pressure could move price to zero.
  • The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-08-27 23:33 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. With tokenAgeDays of ~0.43, there is no holding-period history, no price trend, and no evidence of organic community formation.

PONS Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • mintAuthorityActive and freezeAuthorityActive are both false with null authority addresses, removing the risk of supply inflation or wallet-freezing by the issuer. This is the one clean structural positive.
  • activeDangerousExtensions is empty and no dormant extension warnings are present, so there are no observable programmatic backdoors in the token contract.
  • The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-08-27 23:33 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure.

PONS Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 98.48% of supply.

Is PONS Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: a possible match was detected.
  • Sellability check: inconclusive.

PONS Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this PONS report analyse?

Pons (PONS) is identified by Solana mint Dr3NePPsPbhSBSK95Mg2EPt6YPA66vQqWakvxacPUAzS; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for Pons (PONS)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 14/100 for PONS, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for Pons (PONS)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for PONS as 'Extreme'.

What is the entry assessment for Pons (PONS)?

The entry assessment for PONS is avoid.

How much liquidity does Pons (PONS) have?

Liquidity for PONS was not established in this saved analysis.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for Pons (PONS)?

At the saved check for PONS, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for Pons (PONS)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 98.48% of the total supply of PONS.

Was a sell route found for Pons (PONS) in the saved analysis?

Sell-route availability for PONS was not established in the saved analysis.

When was the AI analysis for Pons (PONS) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for PONS was last updated on 27/08/2026, 23:33:02 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings