MemeAssist

PONS Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: Pons saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: Pons received an Overall Health Score of 9 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Pons received a Low Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: F8ZNaRyV8ayEojia6hu3DsqfhKj8SrxHqQxRSFmHpump

Stale: analysed 61 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

Severe price collapse: 100.00% in 24 hours; Do not enter; a bounce or positive daily return does not erase this market damage; This is not proof of fraud.

Health Score
9/100
Rug risk
11/100 · Low

Severe price collapse: 100.00% in 24 hours. Do not enter. a bounce or positive daily return does not erase this market damage.

  • Severe price collapse: 100.00% in 24 hours. Do not enter; a bounce or positive daily return does not erase this market damage. This is not proof of fraud.
  • A valid measured setup is not established.
  • 1h net flow is sell-led.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: PONS is a ~1-day-old PumpSwap token with a market cap of roughly $1,800 and liquidity of $1,852 — figures so microscopic that any meaningful position would instantly collapse the price. Trading activity has effectively ceased: zero buys and only 1 sell in the past 6 hours, following a ~100% price crash from launch. The observable sell pressure over the token's short life has been catastrophic, with roughly 2,647 sellers versus 4 buyers and sell volume outpacing buy volume by approximately 79:1, indicating a near-completed dump event. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive, which is the sole structural positive; the remaining picture — 15 holders total, a terminal volume profile, and effectively no exit liquidity — places this token in critical territory. At less than 24 hours old, no durability whatsoever can be assessed.

Exact Solana mint: F8ZNaRyV8ayEojia6hu3DsqfhKj8SrxHqQxRSFmHpump. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

PONS Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Pons received an Overall Health Score of 9 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Pons received a Low Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

PONS Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • Zero buys and only 1 sell have occurred in the past 6 hours. With 8,277 buys and 6,914 sells recorded in 24h data but no recent activity, the token appears to have traded to exhaustion with all meaningful participants already exited.
  • Over the ~21-hour observation window, sell volume (~624M tokens) outpaced buy volume (~7.9M tokens) by approximately 79:1, with 2,647 unique sellers versus only 4 unique buyers — a near-total one-sided dump.
  • Observed wallet activity does not establish the wallet holder's motives or conviction.

PONS Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Neither mint nor freeze authority is active, removing the risk of new supply issuance or account freezing — the one clean structural positive in this token's profile.
  • The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-09-04 01:49 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure. The identified dev wallet (GQhH5S…) holds 0% of supply and has recorded zero sells across all tracked windows, though neverSold and firstSeenAt are null so dev behaviour cannot be fully verified.
  • Observed wallet activity does not establish the wallet holder's motives or conviction.

PONS Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 0.42% of supply.

Is PONS Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.

PONS Trade Setup, Entry Levels, Targets and Invalidation

Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 0 resistance areas were identified from 5m market candles; nearest support: 0.0000016567133223247361; Levels derived from 53 5m candles (~25 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice.

PONS Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this PONS report analyse?

Pons (PONS) is identified by Solana mint F8ZNaRyV8ayEojia6hu3DsqfhKj8SrxHqQxRSFmHpump; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for Pons (PONS)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 9/100 for PONS, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for Pons (PONS)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for PONS as 'Low'.

What is the entry assessment for Pons (PONS)?

The entry assessment for PONS is avoid.

How much liquidity does Pons (PONS) have?

The liquidity recorded in the saved analysis for PONS was $1,852.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for Pons (PONS)?

At the saved check for PONS, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for Pons (PONS)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 0.42% of the total supply of PONS.

Was a sell route found for Pons (PONS) in the saved analysis?

A sell route was observed for PONS.

When was the AI analysis for Pons (PONS) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for PONS was last updated on 04/09/2026, 01:49:37 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings