Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.
Historical analysis snapshot.
At a glance: PONS is under 1 day old with just 47 holders and two unlabeled wallets (unlabelled wallet at 80.0% and unlabelled wallet at 19.2%) controlling 99.2% of supply — an extreme concentration that dominates every other read. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive, which removes the worst token-control levers, and the creator field is null so no dev-selling pattern is observable. The ~15.5h swap window shows raw buy volume vastly outweighing sells (2,974 buys vs 14 sells, all sellers small and now exited), but with no reported USD liquidity or market cap and a sub-picocent price, that flow reads as launch-mint noise rather than durable demand. Ranks 3–18 all sit in a tight 0.049–0.055% band, which looks like a scripted equal-size distribution rather than organic accumulation. Far too young, too concentrated and too opaque on liquidity to judge durability.
Exact Solana mint: H8fvkyB3wEy4fR9ppJCLVNtK8zRaH4D1YiW7GLUY7Gui. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.
PONS Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: Pons received an Overall Health Score of 16 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: Pons received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.
What changed between saved analyses?
No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.
PONS Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- unlabelled wallet (80.0%) and unlabelled wallet (19.2%) together control virtually the entire float; either wallet moving even a fraction of their bag would overwhelm any available liquidity.
- Ranks 3 through 18 all hold between 0.049% and 0.055% in a suspiciously uniform band, consistent with a bundled or automated seeding of wallets rather than organic buyers.
- Overview reports null liquidityUsd, marketCapUsd and FDV, so exit feasibility cannot be verified; the sub-picocent price and Meteora DBC pair pattern suggest a bonding-curve launch with unknown depth.
PONS Risk and Health Signals
- Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
- Neither authority is active, so supply cannot be inflated and balances cannot be frozen — the worst structural token-control levers are off the table.
- Creator/dev address resolves to the system program (null), so classic dev-dumping cannot be measured; this removes a signal rather than providing comfort.
- All 11 sellers in the window are small size and every top seller shows remainingPct=0, meaning no large holder has begun distributing yet — but their activity is dust relative to the two mega-wallets.
PONS Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 99.59% of supply.
Is PONS Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: a possible match was detected.
- Sellability check: inconclusive.
PONS Risk Analysis Questions
Which Solana token does this PONS report analyse?
Pons (PONS) is identified by Solana mint H8fvkyB3wEy4fR9ppJCLVNtK8zRaH4D1YiW7GLUY7Gui; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.
What is the AI health score for Pons (PONS)?
The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 16/100 for PONS, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.
What is the automated rug risk level for Pons (PONS)?
The on-chain checks rated rug risk for PONS as 'Extreme'.
What is the entry assessment for Pons (PONS)?
The entry assessment for PONS is avoid.
How much liquidity does Pons (PONS) have?
Liquidity for PONS was not established in this saved analysis.
Are the mint and freeze authorities active for Pons (PONS)?
At the saved check for PONS, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.
What is the top-10 holder concentration for Pons (PONS)?
At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 99.59% of the total supply of PONS.
Was a sell route found for Pons (PONS) in the saved analysis?
Sell-route availability for PONS was not established in the saved analysis.
When was the AI analysis for Pons (PONS) last updated?
The on-chain analysis for PONS was last updated on 24/08/2026, 22:11:47 GMT.