Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.
Historical analysis snapshot.
At a glance: PONS is a less than 24-hour-old PumpSwap token whose health score has now declined from 22 at launch to 6 earlier today, and this snapshot confirms the token remains in terminal condition — market cap is $2,079 against $2,096 in liquidity, representing a near-complete price collapse of ~95% within its first day. The sell-pressure picture is catastrophic: over the observed ~13-hour window, sell volume (~502M tokens) outpaces buy volume (~5.2M tokens) by approximately 96:1, with 'big' wallets (0.1–1% of supply) accounting for ~99.9% of all sell flow from just 52 sellers — a pattern consistent with suspected coordinated insider or launch-buying group-launch distribution having fully unwound. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only. Outside the liquidity pool (which holds 92.5% of supply), only one meaningful non-pool holder remains — wallet unlabelled wallet — holding 7.4% of supply, acquired within the last 8 hours, with no other substantial holders present across a total of just 14 wallets. Mint and freeze authorities are revoked, and no dangerous token extensions are active, but those positives are irrelevant at this stage given the structural collapse. The trajectory — scores of 22, then 6, now effectively unchanged — confirms there has been no recovery, no durability, and no on-chain evidence of genuine demand; this token is too young to judge long-term durability by design, and the observable facts argue strongly against survival.
Exact Solana mint: RLfrUiRmFkjNHqk3jMu3WkCQEnWaJkivQNQQh8qpump. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.
PONS Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: Pons received an Overall Health Score of 7 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: Pons received a Low Rug Risk Rating.
What changed between saved analyses?
No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.
PONS Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- Approximately 52 'big' wallets (classified by token balance at time of sale) sold ~502M tokens in ~13 hours, representing ~99.9% of all sell volume — a pattern strongly consistent with a concentrated launch followed by suspected coordinated mass exit. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only. The price has fallen approximately 95% from launch levels as a direct consequence.
- Only 14 wallets hold any tokens; the liquidity pool holds 92.5% of supply, and a single non-pool wallet holds 7.4%, leaving the remaining circulating supply spread across dust-level positions. This is not a distribution — it is the aftermath of an exit.
- Market cap ($2,079) and liquidity ($2,096) are nearly equal, meaning any further selling will drain the pool and push price toward zero; there is no meaningful price support above the identified support zone ~13% below current price.
PONS Risk and Health Signals
- Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
- Neither mint nor freeze authority is active, and no dangerous token extensions are present — the token cannot be inflated or accounts frozen, eliminating those specific structural attack vectors.
- The identified creator wallet held 0.00% of supply at 2026-09-03 11:28 UTC. 0 tokens were recorded as DEX sales over the preceding 7 days. A last-sale timestamp was not provided; this does not establish ongoing selling or team-wide exposure.
- After the mass sell-out, activity has stopped entirely in the last hour — this could reflect completed distribution or simply abandonment, not genuine stabilisation.
PONS Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 7.46% of supply.
Is PONS Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
PONS Trade Setup, Entry Levels, Targets and Invalidation
Support and resistance context: 1 support area and 0 resistance areas were identified from 15m market candles; nearest support: 0.00000180186298574054; Levels derived from 30 15m candles (~10 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. Heuristic zones, not trading advice.
PONS Risk Analysis Questions
Which Solana token does this PONS report analyse?
Pons (PONS) is identified by Solana mint RLfrUiRmFkjNHqk3jMu3WkCQEnWaJkivQNQQh8qpump; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.
What is the AI health score for Pons (PONS)?
The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 7/100 for PONS, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.
What is the automated rug risk level for Pons (PONS)?
The on-chain checks rated rug risk for PONS as 'Low'.
What is the entry assessment for Pons (PONS)?
The entry assessment for PONS is avoid.
How much liquidity does Pons (PONS) have?
The liquidity recorded in the saved analysis for PONS was $2,096.
Are the mint and freeze authorities active for Pons (PONS)?
At the saved check for PONS, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.
What is the top-10 holder concentration for Pons (PONS)?
At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 7.46% of the total supply of PONS.
Was a sell route found for Pons (PONS) in the saved analysis?
A sell route was observed for PONS.
When was the AI analysis for Pons (PONS) last updated?
The on-chain analysis for PONS was last updated on 03/09/2026, 11:28:31 GMT.