MemeAssist

Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: Pudgy Penguins saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: Pudgy Penguins received an Overall Health Score of 12 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Pudgy Penguins received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: 5N7eb3dDbY9Wgjpc6fBr4XCq6UpBEvXQvjgMdT6fMb2d

Stale: analysed 68 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

One wallet controls 80% of the supply

Health Score
12/100
Rug risk
75/100 · Extreme

One wallet controls 80% of the supply. Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing. A valid measured setup is not established.

  • Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing.
  • One wallet controls 80% of the supply
  • A valid measured setup is not established.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: PENGU on Solana is an extremely fresh token — just ~8.7 hours old — with a $0.05 market cap, zero reported liquidity, and zero 24-hour volume, making this effectively a ghost-chain asset at this moment. Holder concentration is catastrophic: a single wallet (5mCBv…baR) holds 80% of supply and a second (6q8oi…U5h) holds another 17.7%, leaving 97.7% of supply in just two unidentified wallets with no holding-history data available. Both authorities (mint and freeze) are inactive, which removes one structural red flag, but the combination of extreme concentration, null liquidity, and a token age under one day means no track record exists and exit feasibility is essentially zero. The only observed sell pressure in the ~3-hour window is trivially small and comes entirely from small/exited wallets, but this reflects the near-total illiquidity rather than holder confidence.

Exact Solana mint: 5N7eb3dDbY9Wgjpc6fBr4XCq6UpBEvXQvjgMdT6fMb2d. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

PENGU Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Pudgy Penguins received an Overall Health Score of 12 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Pudgy Penguins received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

PENGU Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • Wallet 5mCBv…baR holds 80.0% and 6q8oi…U5h holds 17.7% of all supply; neither is labelled, neither has holding-history data, and together they can move price or drain liquidity unilaterally at any moment.
  • Liquidity is null and 24-hour volume is $0; the sole trading pair on Meteora DBC was created less than 9 hours ago with a $0.05 market cap, meaning any meaningful exit order has no market to fill against.
  • At ~0.36 days old, there is no holder behaviour history, no price history, and no evidence of survival beyond the initial mint event; all structural risks are elevated by this total absence of track record.

PENGU Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Neither mintAuthorityActive nor freezeAuthorityActive is true, and no dangerous token extensions are flagged; supply cannot be arbitrarily inflated and wallets cannot be frozen by the issuer.
  • In the ~3-hour observation window, 2,974 buy trades vs 10 sell trades and ~$182.5M token-unit buy volume vs ~$2,619 sell volume — however this figure is in raw token units against a $0.05 market cap and reflects early speculative interest, not real capital deployment.
  • Over 500 distinct wallets executed buys since launch, which could indicate genuine discovery interest, but with null liquidity and a $0.05 market cap this cannot be distinguished from bot activity or dust buys.

PENGU Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 98.85% of supply.

Is PENGU Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: a possible match was detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.

PENGU Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this PENGU report analyse?

Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) is identified by Solana mint 5N7eb3dDbY9Wgjpc6fBr4XCq6UpBEvXQvjgMdT6fMb2d; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for Pudgy Penguins (PENGU)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 12/100 for PENGU, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for Pudgy Penguins (PENGU)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for PENGU as 'Extreme'.

What is the entry assessment for Pudgy Penguins (PENGU)?

The entry assessment for PENGU is avoid.

How much liquidity does Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) have?

Liquidity for PENGU was not established in this saved analysis.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for Pudgy Penguins (PENGU)?

At the saved check for PENGU, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for Pudgy Penguins (PENGU)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 98.85% of the total supply of PENGU.

Was a sell route found for Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) in the saved analysis?

A sell route was observed for PENGU.

When was the AI analysis for Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for PENGU was last updated on 28/08/2026, 10:01:07 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings