MemeAssist

QQ Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: QQ saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: QQ received an Overall Health Score of 7 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: QQ received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: FHYrnaMTsejuDgjBWfSeygVijPD6DqEZvmxwCrawJJjH

Stale: analysed 76 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

Severe price collapse: 98.33% in 24 hours; Do not enter; a bounce or positive daily return does not erase this market damage; This is not proof of fraud.

Health Score
7/100
Rug risk
75/100 · Extreme

Severe price collapse: 98.33% in 24 hours. Do not enter. a bounce or positive daily return does not erase this market damage.

  • Severe price collapse: 98.33% in 24 hours. Do not enter; a bounce or positive daily return does not erase this market damage. This is not proof of fraud.
  • A valid measured setup is not established.
  • 12h net flow is sell-led.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: QQ is a Solana token only ~1.1 days old with a catastrophically concentrated holder structure: a single wallet (unlabelled wallet) holds 80.5% of total supply, and the top 7 whales collectively own 99.3% of all tokens. Liquidity is effectively zero at $0.08 against a $6,221 market cap, meaning any meaningful exit is structurally impossible — the price impact of even a tiny sell would be total. The token has already lost 98.3% in 24 hours, and whale-sized sell volume (~97% of all sells) from top holders including unlabelled wallet (4.3% of supply, partially exited) and others confirms active distribution by the largest holders. Mint and freeze authorities are inactive, which removes two structural attack vectors, but this is overwhelmed by the concentration, near-zero liquidity, and the fact that the decentralisation trend is recorded as worsening. At just over one day old with no track record, no key levels available, and essentially no liquid market, this token cannot be safely assessed as anything other than a critical-risk asset.

Exact Solana mint: FHYrnaMTsejuDgjBWfSeygVijPD6DqEZvmxwCrawJJjH. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

QQ Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: QQ received an Overall Health Score of 7 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: QQ received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

QQ Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • Wallet unlabelled wallet holds 8 billion tokens (80.54% of total supply) and has shown zero movement — it can dump at any moment into a market with $0.08 of liquidity. This single entity can destroy any remaining value instantly.
  • With only $0.08 of on-chain liquidity against a $6,221 market cap (~0.001% liquidity-to-mcap ratio), there is no realistic exit path for any holder; even a micro-sell causes catastrophic slippage.
  • 97% of all sell volume over 24 hours came from whale-sized wallets (>1% of supply), including confirmed top holder unlabelled wallet (sold 440M tokens, still holds 4.3%) and 3c5XM…cRY (sold 1.58B tokens); this is textbook insider distribution, not retail churn.

QQ Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Neither mint nor freeze authority is active, removing the risk of supply dilution or token freezing by a malicious actor — this is the only clean structural positive in this dataset.
  • Wallet unlabelled wallet added 312M tokens (~5.15% of supply) and has never sold, flagged as accumulating — however, given the overall collapse and ultra-thin liquidity, this signal carries minimal weight and may reflect a connected wallet, not genuine external demand.
  • The raw buy/sell trade count ratio looks strong, but 97% of sell volume is whale-sized and the net token flow shows whales exiting; high buy counts at micro-size against whale distribution is a classic distribution pattern, not genuine momentum.

QQ Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 99.92% of supply.

Is QQ Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: a sell route was observed.

QQ Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this QQ report analyse?

QQ (QQ) is identified by Solana mint FHYrnaMTsejuDgjBWfSeygVijPD6DqEZvmxwCrawJJjH; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for QQ (QQ)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 7/100 for QQ, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for QQ (QQ)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for QQ as 'Extreme'.

What is the entry assessment for QQ (QQ)?

The entry assessment for QQ is avoid.

How much liquidity does QQ (QQ) have?

The liquidity recorded in the saved analysis for QQ was $0.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for QQ (QQ)?

At the saved check for QQ, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for QQ (QQ)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 99.92% of the total supply of QQ.

Was a sell route found for QQ (QQ) in the saved analysis?

A sell route was observed for QQ.

When was the AI analysis for QQ (QQ) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for QQ was last updated on 20/08/2026, 08:15:25 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings