MemeAssist

QQ Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

Saved analysis ·

Saved verdict: QQ saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.

Overall Health Score: QQ received an Overall Health Score of 8 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: QQ received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

Solana mint: zn9JxhQgDfALhCp8QgmHHQXz6CATHNGH1ZkEdgiH3Lp

Stale: analysed 76 days ago. Scores may be out of date. Re-analyse before trading.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Avoid

One wallet controls 82% of the supply

Health Score
8/100
Rug risk
75/100 · Extreme

One wallet controls 82% of the supply. Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing. A valid measured setup is not established.

  • Turnover is unverified because 24-hour volume or positive pool liquidity is missing.
  • One wallet controls 82% of the supply
  • A valid measured setup is not established.

Flags

Ranked flags unavailable.

Trade setup

No reliable setup: unavailable.

Read the saved analysis

Automated risk analysis by MemeAssist.

Historical analysis snapshot.

At a glance: QQ is a near-brand-new Solana token (under 24 hours old) with extreme structural concentration: a single wallet (7unQ…HtB / owner FhVo…3k7) holds 82.4% of supply and a second (Ehfm…yaU / owner unlabelled wallet) holds 14.6%, meaning just two wallets control 97% of all tokens. Liquidity, market cap, FDV, and price-change data are all null, making exit feasibility completely unknowable from on-chain data. A whale-sized seller (38qS…u3Q) exited a position of ~1.42 billion tokens within the past 21 hours and fully exited — notable given the tiny number of total sells — while the two dominant top holders have shown zero activity, meaning their 97% stake is entirely unrealised overhang. Mint and freeze authorities are revoked and no dangerous extensions are active, which are the only unambiguous structural positives. At under one day old with no liquidity data, null market cap, near-zero trading activity, and catastrophic supply concentration, this token is far too young and structurally opaque to assess durability — the structure remains consistent with a pre-exit or abandoned token.

Exact Solana mint: zn9JxhQgDfALhCp8QgmHHQXz6CATHNGH1ZkEdgiH3Lp. Verify this Solana mint on Solscan.

QQ Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: QQ received an Overall Health Score of 8 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: QQ received an Extreme Rug Risk Rating.

What changed between saved analyses?

No earlier completed analysis is available for comparison.

QQ Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

  • Wallet FhVo…3k7 holds 82.4% and unlabelled wallet holds 14.6% of total supply — 97% combined — with no sales recorded yet. Any suspected coordinated exit by either wallet would be devastating and completely unabsorbable at current activity levels. Same-slot timing alone does not establish coordination or common ownership; shared signed transactions establish co-execution only.
  • Liquidity, FDV, and market cap are all null; there is no way to assess exit feasibility, position sizing, or whether the pool can absorb any meaningful sell. This is not a soft gap — it means the market structure is effectively invisible.
  • Wallet 38qS…u3Q sold ~1.42 billion tokens (nearly 15% of supply by volume) and fully exited within 0.59 days of holding, accounting for ~99.996% of all sell volume recorded. This is a fast-exit pattern consistent with a bundled-buy-and-dump at launch.

QQ Risk and Health Signals

  • Smart-money signal: no tracked participation was observed.
  • Both mintAuthority and freezeAuthority are null and inactive, removing the ability to inflate supply or freeze holder wallets — the one clean structural positive in this token.
  • activeDangerousExtensions is empty and no dormant extension warnings are present, meaning there are no on-chain programmable traps identified.
  • The 82.4% and 14.6% holders show zero change over 1d/7d/30d windows — but this is ambiguous: it equally means an undisturbed rug setup as it does confident holding, especially with no sale history or identity data.

QQ Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: At the saved analysis, the top 10 non-pool holders held 100.00% of supply.

Is QQ Safe?

  • Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
  • Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
  • Copycat check: no match detected.
  • Sellability check: inconclusive.

QQ Risk Analysis Questions

Which Solana token does this QQ report analyse?

QQ (QQ) is identified by Solana mint zn9JxhQgDfALhCp8QgmHHQXz6CATHNGH1ZkEdgiH3Lp; names and symbols can be reused by unrelated tokens.

What is the AI health score for QQ (QQ)?

The saved analysis recorded an AI health score of 8/100 for QQ, based on on-chain behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity at that time.

What is the automated rug risk level for QQ (QQ)?

The on-chain checks rated rug risk for QQ as 'Extreme'.

What is the entry assessment for QQ (QQ)?

The entry assessment for QQ is avoid.

How much liquidity does QQ (QQ) have?

Liquidity for QQ was not established in this saved analysis.

Are the mint and freeze authorities active for QQ (QQ)?

At the saved check for QQ, the mint authority was revoked and the freeze authority was revoked.

What is the top-10 holder concentration for QQ (QQ)?

At the saved check, the top 10 holders held 100.00% of the total supply of QQ.

Was a sell route found for QQ (QQ) in the saved analysis?

Sell-route availability for QQ was not established in the saved analysis.

When was the AI analysis for QQ (QQ) last updated?

The on-chain analysis for QQ was last updated on 20/08/2026, 16:06:00 GMT.

Methodology & limitations

Health and rug risk are separate evidence ratings; unknown checks are not passes and projected levels are untested.

Saved analysis, not live, re-analyse before trading.

Recently analysed tokens · Screened Solana rankings