QI Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup

QI Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary

Overall Health Score: Quantum Inu has an Overall Health Score of 42 out of 100.

Rug Risk Rating: Quantum Inu has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.

QI Rug-Pull Risk Analysis

• Six wallets connected by direct token transfers collectively hold approximately 16.2% of supply. All six appear in the top-whale cohort; if they act in coordination, exit pressure could be severe relative to available liquidity.
• Price has fallen from a sustained close near $0.00412 to ~$0.0014 — a 66% drawdown within the 67-hour observable window. This signals aggressive early selling and indicates that many early buyers are deeply underwater.
• At under 3 days old, QI has no verified survival history, no tested support levels, and no multi-week holder cohort. Every sub-score carries elevated uncertainty as a result.

QI Risk and Health Signals

• The pump.fun creator wallet (high-confidence identification) holds 0% of supply with no recorded sales at any timeframe. This removes the most immediate rug vector from the equation.
• Both mint and freeze authority are null and inactive, meaning no party can dilute supply or freeze wallets. This is a clean authority structure for a token of this age.
• Net whale flow over the past day is strongly positive (~25.8M tokens net bought). However, average whale holding duration is just 1.8 days, limiting how much conviction this signal carries.

QI Holder Distribution

Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 25.8% of supply.

Is QI Safe?

• Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
• Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
• Copycat check: no match detected.
• Sellability check: inconclusive.
• Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.

QI Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets

Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 4 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.0013259379372356369; nearest resistance: 0.00147; Levels derived from 67 1h candles (~2.8 days) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice. Chart history could not yet support tested swing levels. The token is only about 2.8 days old. These lower-confidence planning levels are projected mechanically from the observed market price and must be rechecked as price history develops..

QI Price and Market Data

Assessment: Quantum Inu (QI) is a 2.8-day-old PumpSwap memecoin with a $1.33M market cap and $132K DEX liquidity. The historical price risk assessment is "clear" for the observed 67-hour window — no 90%+ sustained-peak collapse has been recorded — but the token has already shed 66% from its peak close of ~$0.00412, and at under three days old it has no meaningful track record to judge long-term durability. A six-wallet cluster (combined ~16.2% of supply, linked by direct token transfers) dominates the whale cohort; 9 of 10 tracked whales are labeled "accumulating," but their average holding period is just 1.8 days, which limits confidence in that signal. Mint and freeze authorities are revoked and the dev wallet (2sRsJHLSBtf…) holds 0% of supply with no recorded selling, which is structurally positive but does not offset the cluster concentration risk. Short-window sell pressure is elevated — mid-sized wallets (just 11 sellers) drove 78% of recent sell volume — and decentralization is trending worse; this is a high-risk, speculative structure that requires caution even with the bullish whale flow data.

Reason: A linked six-wallet cluster controls ~16% of supply on a 2.8-day-old token that has already shed 66% from its peak, making structural insider exit risk the dominant concern despite a clean dev wallet and bullish whale-flow headline.

Report limitations

• This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
• It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.