Server-rendered summary
QUBIT Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup
Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.
Exact Solana mint: ERkmk5rs8KKD9u2fxoDZUmwwuVc7rT3sSeowGTrQuBit
QUBIT Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: QUBIT has an Overall Health Score of 38 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: QUBIT has a low Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.
Trade Check: QUBIT Trade Check decision: wait. Token safety: clear. Trade Setup quality: weak. Condition to watch: Wait for tested chart structure to confirm the projected levels.
Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: weak. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.
QUBIT Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- QUBIT is only ~2 days old; every whale, holder cohort and volume pattern reflects days-old activity with no durable holding demonstrated. All structural signals carry very low conviction and could reverse within hours.
- In the most recent ~3-hour window, 'big' wallet sellers (0.1–1% of supply) drove over 55% of total sell volume across just 32 sellers, with net sell-side imbalance of ~$31M in token terms. This is not retail churn.
- Price is approximately 70% below the sustained early peak of ~$0.000433, with a -58% move in the last 6 hours alone. The historicalPriceRisk window is too short (48h) to rule out further collapse.
QUBIT Risk and Health Signals
- The pump.fun creator wallet (high-confidence identification) holds effectively zero tokens and records zero sells across all observed windows — a meaningful structural positive distinguishing this from active dev-rug setups.
- Both mint and freeze authorities are confirmed inactive with null holders, removing two critical token-control attack vectors entirely.
- Nine of the ten largest non-pool holders show positive balance changes, but all entered within the last 2 days and average holding duration is under 1 day — accumulation labels reflect recency of purchase, not conviction or durability.
QUBIT Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 20.8% of supply.
Is QUBIT Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
- Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.
QUBIT Trade Setup, Entry Levels and Targets
Support and resistance context: 2 support areas and 3 resistance areas were identified from 1h market candles; nearest support: 0.000123936; nearest resistance: 0.00023355809970606583; Levels derived from 48 1h candles (~47 hours) of pool price history via swing-point clustering. History is too short for repeated-touch levels; some levels are derived from volume-profile nodes and the window high/low (lower confidence, untested). Heuristic zones, not trading advice. Chart history could not yet support tested swing levels. The token is only about 2.0 days old. These lower-confidence planning levels are projected mechanically from the observed market price and must be rechecked as price history develops..
QUBIT Price and Market Data
Assessment: QUBIT is a 2-day-old PumpSwap memecoin at ~$123K market cap, far too young to assess long-term durability — all structural signals must be weighted accordingly. The token has already drawn down roughly 70% from its sustained peak of ~$0.000433, and while the historicalPriceRisk assessment reads "clear" (no 90%+ collapse detected in the 48-hour window), the actual drawdown is significant and reflects a sharp early peak followed by sustained selling. Authority controls are clean — mint and freeze authorities are both revoked — and the developer wallet ([redacted wallet]) holds essentially zero supply and shows no selling activity, which is a meaningful structural positive. Holder concentration is moderate: 19 whale wallets control ~32% of supply excluding pools, all entered within the last 2 days, with average holding of under 1 day, and the decentralisation trend is worsening. Sell pressure across the observed 3-hour window shows a net negative flow of ~$31M in token volume terms, with "big" wallets (0.1–1% of supply) driving over 55% of sell volume; 9 of the 10 tracked whales are labelled accumulating but all were first seen within the last 2 days, so these are fresh entries with no track record. Liquidity at ~$35K against a $123K market cap is thin but above the critical floor, and 24-hour volume of ~$1M dwarfs market cap — a sign of speculative churn rather than organic demand. This token is high-risk and too young to trust; the structure is not yet a rug setup but meaningful exit pressure and concentration in very new wallets demand caution.
Reason: A 70% drawdown from peak, sustained sell-side dominance across all windows driven by large wallets, extreme token youth with no tested price structure, and worsening decentralisation make this a speculative, high-risk position only suitable for those explicitly accepting the probability of further s
Report limitations
- The setup uses lower-confidence projected levels.
- This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
- It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.
Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.
Analyzed: