Server-rendered summary
ROCKSTAR Meme Coin Risk Analysis & Trade Setup
Saved analysis: . The findings below describe evidence recorded at that time, not live market conditions.
Historical analysis snapshot. This report is more than six hours old. This snapshot is not a current buy or sell signal. Trade decisions, prices, levels and sellability may have changed. Re-analyse before making a current trading decision.
Exact Solana mint: PYuGdoXWjY27U1MKRUJEbohQCkWq8tL3Jr2CjqkzwEs
ROCKSTAR Risk Analysis and Trade Setup Summary
Overall Health Score: RockStar has an Overall Health Score of 6 out of 100.
Rug Risk Rating: RockStar has an extreme Rug Risk Rating. This reflects collected on-chain evidence and is not a safety guarantee.
Trade Check: RockStar saved Trade Check decision at analysis time: avoid. This is historical evidence, not a current buy or sell signal. Recorded token safety: dangerous. Recorded Trade Setup quality: unavailable.
Trade Setup: Trade Setup status: unavailable. Trade levels are time-sensitive and should be re-analysed when stale.
ROCKSTAR Rug-Pull Risk Analysis
- [redacted wallet] holds 87.4% and [redacted wallet] holds 11.1% of total supply; these wallets are unlabelled, have no holding-duration data, and represent an existential exit-liquidity risk to any retail participant. If either wallet attempts to sell even a fraction, there is no meaningful liquidity to absorb it.
- DEX liquidity of $0.02 renders the token completely untradeable in any meaningful size; the reported price and market cap are non-credible artefacts. Entry or exit at any scale above a few cents is structurally impossible.
- Wallet [redacted wallet] sold 100% of its ~1.02 billion token position — 100% of all observed sell volume — and is now fully exited after holding for less than one day. This confirms at least one sizable early participant has already distributed and left.
ROCKSTAR Risk and Health Signals
- Neither mint nor freeze authority is active, meaning the supply cannot be inflated and wallets cannot be frozen by the token deployer. This removes two common structural attack vectors, though it does not offset the concentration risk.
- The holderIntel data reports zero detected clusters and slow-rug risk is rated low by the heuristic; however, with only 34 holders and no transfer-graph data available, the absence of detected clusters is as likely a data limitation as a genuine signal.
- On the surface this looks bullish, but with $0.09 in total 24-hour volume and only $0.02 in liquidity, this ratio is meaningless and likely reflects bot activity or dust transactions rather than real demand. Volume quality is effectively zero.
ROCKSTAR Holder Distribution
Holder concentration: The top 10 non-pool holders control 100.0% of supply.
Is ROCKSTAR Safe?
- Creator risk check: no blacklist match found.
- Wash-trading check: no suspicious activity detected.
- Copycat check: no match detected.
- Sellability check: a sell route was observed.
- Smart-money check: no tracked participation was observed.
ROCKSTAR Price and Market Data
Assessment: ROCKSTAR ([redacted wallet]) is barely one day old with an essentially non-functional DEX market: reported liquidity of $0.02 and 24-hour volume of $0.09 against a stated market cap of $61.4M make the price figure and market cap entirely non-credible and likely an artefact of the trading mechanism rather than real price discovery. Supply concentration remains catastrophically extreme — wallet [redacted wallet] holds 87.4% and [redacted wallet] holds 11.1%, together controlling 98.5% of all tokens, with no holding-duration data available and no on-chain linkage or labelling to clarify whether these are team, launchpad, or escrow wallets. The token is far too young and its market structure far too abnormal to assign any reliability to any positive signal.
Report limitations
- This automated snapshot can be wrong, incomplete, or become outdated as on-chain and market conditions change.
- It is informational analysis, not financial advice or a guarantee that the token is safe.
Read the MemeAssist methodology for evidence sources, scoring and known constraints.
Analyzed: